Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 683 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2025
T.C.A. No.111 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.07.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
Tax Case Appeal No.11 1 of 2016
Commissioner of Income Tax
Chennai. .. Appellant
-vs-
M/s.The Willingdon Charitable Trust,
No.603, 6th Floor, Rani Seethai Hall,
Chennai 600 006. .. Respondent
Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961,
against the order dated 15.05.2015 passed in ITA No.1044/Mds/2014 on
the file of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'C' Bench, Chennai for
the Assessment Year 2009-10.
For Appellant : Ms.V.Pushpa
Stdg. Counsel
For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Sriraman
*****
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/07/2025 12:21:23 pm )
T.C.A. No.111 of 2016
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Both counsels are ad idem that the amount involved is only
Rs.1,84,10,624/-, which is less than Rs.2 crores threshold given in Circular
No.9/2024, for filing/pursuing an appeal in High Court.
2. Ms.Pushpa submitted that the origin of the impugned order is an
order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and therefore,
would fall under the exceptions given in Circular No.5/2024.
3. We agree with Mr.Sriraman that in this case, exceptions would not
fall under the exemptions, though the origin is under Section 263 of the
Act, because Clause 3.1(f) of the Circular No.5/2024 starts with the words
"Where the tax effect is not quantifiable or not involved..." In the case at
hand, the tax effect has been quantified as Rs.1,84,10,624/-.
4. Moreover, though it refers to order passed under Section 263 of
the Act, it again says that the reference to cases involving sections referred
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/07/2025 12:21:23 pm )
here, where it is not possible to quantify the tax effect or the tax effect is
not involved, is for the purpose of illustration only. Therefore, this
exception would not apply where the tax effect is quantifiable and in this
case, it has already been quantified. Therefore, this would fall under the
'less than tax effect' cases.
5. Moreover, the Circulars issued under Section 268A of the Act itself
provides that it is a step towards management of litigation and the Board
has been revising the monetary limits for filing of appeal from time to time.
Circular No.5/2024 also states that monetary limits shall be applicable to
all cases, including those relating to TDS/TCS under the Act, with the
exception where the tax effect is not quantifiable or not involved.
Therefore, since in the present case the tax effect is quantified, in our view,
it would not be covered under the exception.
Appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs.
(K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ.) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.)
01.07.2025
Index : Yes/No
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/07/2025 12:21:23 pm )
Neutral Citation : Yes/No
sra
The Hon'ble Chief Justice
and
Sunder Mohan, J.
(sra)
To
1. The Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal Madras 'C' Bench, Chennai.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Chennai.
T.C.A. No.11 1 of 2016
01.07.2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/07/2025 12:21:23 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!