Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S. Suriyaprabha vs S. Karthikeyan
2025 Latest Caselaw 1973 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1973 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 January, 2025

Madras High Court

S. Suriyaprabha vs S. Karthikeyan on 23 January, 2025

Author: J.Nisha Banu
Bench: J.Nisha Banu
                                                                                    C.M.A.No.4534 of 2019

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED : 23.01.2025

                                                         CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
                                                   and
                                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL

                                                 C.M.A.No.4534 of 2019

                     S. Suriyaprabha                                         ...     Appellant

                                                         Vs.


                     S. Karthikeyan                                           ...    Respondent



                     Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 19 of
                     Family Courts Act, 1984, to set aside the judgment and decree dated
                     30.08.2019 made in H.M.O.P.No.457 of 2015 on the file of the Principal
                     Family Court, Coimbatore.


                                      For Appellant      : Mr.C.Prabakaran

                                      For Respondent     : Mr.V.Manohar

                                                       -----




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     Page 1/6
                                                                                     C.M.A.No.4534 of 2019

                                                         JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by J. Nisha Banu, J)

The present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the

appellant/wife against the order judgment and decree dated 30.08.2019

allowing the petition filed by the respondent/husband for divorce in

H.M.O.P.No.457 of 2015 passed by the Principal Judge, Principal Family

Court, Coimbatore.

2. The appellant/wife had also filed M.C.No.155 of 2016, in

which, the Court below directed the respondent/husband to pay a sum of

Rs.9,000/- to the appellant/wife and a sum of Rs.3,000/- to the minor

child as monthly maintenance and a sum of Rs.20,000/- towards the

litigation expenses.

3. The learned counsel for the appellant/wife would state that

challenging the order passed in the maintenance case, the appellant/wife

preferred Crl.R.C.No.1269 and 1430 of 2019 before this Court and this

Court, by order dated 17.08.2022, enhanced the said amount from a sum

of Rs.12,000/- to a sum of Rs.18,500/-. The learned counsel for the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

appellant has also filed a calculation memo dated 23.01.2025. As per the

memo, a sum of Rs.9,81,500/- has been received by the appellant/wife

from the respondent/husband till 06.01.2025. The balance amount of

Rs.8,70,000/- has to be paid by the the respondent/husband as on

06.08.2024.

4. The learned counsel for the appellant would further state that

the respondent/husband is in huge arrears of maintenance and the order

passed by this Court has not been complied with by the respondent.

5. It is relevant to point out at this juncture the decision of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in Kaushalya Vs. Mukesh Jain, (2020)

17 SCC 822, wherein it has been held as follows:-

"In the event that there is any failure on the part of the respondent to comply with the order for deposit of arrears and month to month installments, it will be open to the appellant to apply before the Family Court to get the defence of the respondent struck off".

6. Further, in the decision reported in AIR 2021 SC 569 (Rajnesh

Vs. Neha), the Hon'ble Supreme Court had passed a detailed judgment

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

giving certain Guidelines/ Directions on Maintenance to be followed and

in the said decision, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed as

follows:-

"The Court concluded that if there was non-payment of interim maintenance, the defence of the respondent is liable to be struck off, and the appeal filed by the appellant-wife can be allowed, without hearing the respondent".

7. As per the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, if the

husband does not comply with the order of the Court, the defence of the

respondent/husband is liable to be struck off, and the appeal filed by the

appellant/wife can be allowed, without hearing the respondent. In the

light of the above, we are not inclined to allow the respondent/husband

to prosecute the appeal without paying the arrears the maintenance.

Therefore, the judgment and decree dated 30.08.2019 made in

H.M.O.P.No.457 of 2015 on the file of the Principal Family Court,

Coimbatore, is hereby set aside and the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is

allowed. There shall be no order as to costs.

(J.N.B, J.) (R.S.V., J.) 23.01.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

asi

To

The Principal Judge, Principal Family Court, Coimbatore.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

J. NISHA BANU, J.

and R. SAKTHIVEL, J.

asi

23.01.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter