Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

D. Praburaj vs The Director Of School Education
2025 Latest Caselaw 3068 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3068 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 February, 2025

Madras High Court

D. Praburaj vs The Director Of School Education on 20 February, 2025

Author: C.V. Karthikeyan
Bench: C.V. Karthikeyan
                                                                              W.P.No. 3669 of 2024

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS


                                                Dated : 20.02.2025

                                                     CORAM:

                            THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN

                                             W.P.No.3669 of 2024 and
                                             W.M.P. No.3959 of 2024

                     D. Praburaj                                               ... Petitioner

                                                         vs

                     1. The Director of School Education,
                        DPI Campus, College Road,
                        Chennai 600 006.

                     2. The Chief Educational Officer,
                        Kanchipuram District,
                        Kanchipuram.

                     3. The District Educational Officer (Secondary),
                        Kanchipuram Educational District,
                        Kanchipuram District.

                     4. The Correspondent,
                        Anderson Higher Secondary School,
                        Kanchipuram 631 501.                              ...Respondents

                     Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India praying to issue a Writ, order, or direction more particularly a writ
                     in the nature of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records
                     relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the 3rd respondent in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     1/7
                                                                                     W.P.No. 3669 of 2024

                     Na.Ka. No.2095/Aa1/2021 dated 25.05.2022 and to quash the same and
                     consequently directing the respondents 1 to 3 to approve the appointment
                     of petitioner in the post of B.T. Assistant (English) in 4th respondent
                     school with effect from 22.10.2018 with all consequential and other
                     attendant benefits, including the arrears of salary.


                                  For Petitioner            : Mr. S. Nedunchezhiyan

                                  For R1 to R3              : Mrs. S. Mythereye Chandru
                                                              Special Government Pleader

                                                               ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a certiorarified

Mandamus seeking the records relating to the proceedings issued by the

third respondent dated 25.05.2022 and to quash the same.

2. The petitioner seeks a consequential direction against the

respondents 1 to 3 to approve the appointment of the petitioner as B.T.

Assistant (English) in the fourth respondent school with effect from

22.10.2018 together with consequential and other attendant benefits

including arrears of salary.

3. In the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition it had been

contended that the fourth respondent school, Anderson Higher Secondary https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

School at Kancheepuram, is a Christian Minority Institution coming

under the management of Church of South India. There are about 2700

students studying the said school. It is an aided religious minority

institution. It had been further contended that owing to the retirement of

a secondary grade teacher, a vacancy had arisen on and from 01.06.2017.

It was also contended that being a minority institution, the G.O. M.S.

No.144, School Education Department dated 04.07.2008 would not be

directly applicable to the fourth respondent school and the fourth

respondent school would have the right to upgrade the post to B.T.

Assistant. It had also been stated that the fourth respondent school being

a minority institution and recognised as a minority institution, could also

appoint teachers not qualified in Teacher Eligibility Test (TET).

4. The impugned order proceeds on the basis that the fourth

respondent school had upgraded the post of secondary grade teacher to

B.T. Assistant and therefore, placing reliance on G.O. M.S. No.144

dated 04.07.2008, had refused to grant approval to the appointment of the

petitioner. In the impugned order it had also been contended that the

petitioner was not qualified in TET examination and therefore, was not

eligible to be considered for appointment to the post of B.T. Assistant https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

teacher. But, however, both the issues no longer survive adjudication by

this Court since, with respect to the application or otherwise of G.O.

M.S. No.144 of 04.07.2008, it had been contended by the learned counsel

for the petitioner that a Division Bench of this Court by a judgment

reported in 2016 SCC Online Mad 26972 (A.Firdose Begum vs. The

Secretary to Government, School Education Department of Tamil

Nadu, Chennai) had very categorically stated that a minority school

would have the right to upgrade the sanctioned post. This observation by

the Division Bench was issued with specific reference to G.O. M.S.

No.144, School Education Department dated 04.07.2008. That

observation by the Division Bench is binding on this Court.

5.With respect to the second issue of qualification of TET

examination, again a Division Bench of this Court in W.A. No.19 of

2023 batch, by an order dated 14.06.2023, issued a clarification that

TET is not a necessary mandate for teachers appointed in minority

schools. An earlier Division Bench judgment had so stated and it was

clarified that the observation of mandatory requirement, and it had been

very specifically stated that the principle laid down, namely, that

qualification in TET is a necessary mandate for teachers, would not be https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

applicable for teachers appointed to minority institutions. It is thus

clear that the impugned order necessarily has to be set aside and

interfered with and it is set aside .

6. The Writ Petition stands allowed. A direction is given to the

second / third respondent to grant approval of the appointment of the

petitioner to the post of B.T. Assistant (English) on and from 22.10.2018

and also grant approval for disbursement of consequential and all other

benefits which were attached to the post of B.T. Assistant (English) and

pass appropriate orders within a period of ten (10) weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order.

7. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands allowed. No

costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

20.02.2025

Internet : Yes / No Index: Yes / No Speaking order / Non speaking order Bga

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

To

1. The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006.

2. The Chief Educational Officer, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram.

3. The District Educational Officer (Secondary), Kanchipuram Educational District, Kanchipuram District.

4. The Correspondent, Anderson Higher Secondary School, Kanchipuram 631 501.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.V. KARTHIKEYAN, J.

bga

W.P.No.3669 of 2024 and

20.02.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter