Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sivasankar vs The Inspector Of Police
2025 Latest Caselaw 3035 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3035 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 February, 2025

Madras High Court

Sivasankar vs The Inspector Of Police on 20 February, 2025

                                                                         Crl.O.P.(MD)No.22635 of 2024


                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                   DATED: 20.02.2025

                                                        CORAM

                                  THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL

                                           Crl.O.P.(MD)No.22635 of 2024
                                                       and
                                           Crl.M.P(MD) No.14139 of 2024

                     Sivasankar                                                 .. Petitioner

                                                           Vs.

                     1. The Inspector of Police
                        Airport Police Station
                        Trichy City

                     2.Periyasamy
                       Inspector of Police(Incharge)
                       Airport Police Station
                       Trichy                                                  .. Respondents

                     PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS,
                     to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime
                     No.414 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same as
                     illegal so far as the petitioner is concerned.


                                  For Petitioner         : Mr.A.Azhageson

                                  For Respondents        : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar
                                                           Government Advocate(Crl.Side)




                     1/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                               Crl.O.P.(MD)No.22635 of 2024


                                                            ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the First

Information Report in Crime No.414 of 2020 on the file of the first

respondent police.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 27.09.2020 when the

second respondent was in patrol duty they found the petitioner along with

other accused playing cards with stake during the pandemic period near

wireless road, RR residency. On seeing police, the petitioner along with

his friends tried to escape from the occurrence place. But they were caught

by the police and they seized the money and cards and thereafter, FIR has

been registered in Crime No.414 of 2020 for the offence under Section 12

of Tamil Nadu Gaming Act.

3.No counter was filed on the side of the respondents.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend

that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence

Section 12 of Tamil Nadu Gaming Act. A false case has been foisted

against the petitioner. As per Section 12 of Tamil nadu Gaming Act, the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.22635 of 2024

occurrence has to be taken place in the public place. In the case on hand,

there is no specific mention about public place. Only vague allegation that

behind wireless road, RR residency, the occurrence was taken place.

Therefore, the offence under Section 12 of Tamil Nadu Gaming Act would

not attract. Thereby, the First Information Report is liable to be quashed.

5.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner relied on the

order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD) No.12445 of 2020 in the case

of Chandrasekar and others .vs. The Sub Inspector of Police,

Thirumangalam Town Poilce Station, Madurai District and others.

6.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the

first respondent would contend that on the date of occurrence, all the

accused persons played cards with money (ntl;L Ml;lk;). Thereby, the

respondent police who were on patrol, arrested the accused persons and

seized money of Rs.500/~ and cards and thereafter, registered First

Information Report and no any valid ground to quash the First

Information Report.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.22635 of 2024

7.This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on

records.

8. The main contention raised by the petitioner is that the place of

occurrence has not been specifically mentioned by the respondent police

and vaguely stated that behind wireless road, RR residency. In order to

attract provision under Section 12 of Tamil Nadu Gaming Act, game has

to be in public place or public street. In this case, the allegation is that

behind wireless road, RR residency, there is no specific place mentioned

by the respondents.

9.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner relied upon the

judgment of this Court in Saminathan and others v. The Inspector of

Police in Crl.O.P.No.6366 of 2021, wherein this Court in para no.6 held as

follows:-

“6.This Court finds that there is no material in the impugned final report to show that the place where the petitioners are alleged to have indulged in gaming with cards is a public place. There is only a vague reference stating that it was in front of the cosmopolitan club. One

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.22635 of 2024

cannot infer that it is a public place from such an allegation. Hence, the necessary ingredient to constitute the offence under Section 12 of the Tamil Nadu Gaming Act, 1930 that gaming has to be in a public street or a public place is not satisfied in the instant case. Hence, this Court is inclined to quash the final report. That apart, it is seen that the petitioners who are senior citizens, are the members of the cosmopolitan club and there was no necessity for them to play outside the club. Hence, this Court is inclined to quash the final report.

10. On careful reading of the aforesaid judgment, it is clear that to

attract the Section 12 of Tamil Nadu Gaming Act, game has to be played

in public place or public street otherwise Section 12 of Tamil Nadu

Gaming Act would not attract. In this case, the place of occurrence

mentioned as behind the wireless road, RR residency and no mention

about the public place. The vague reference by stating behind wireless

road, RR residency is not sufficient to attract the provision under Section

12 of Tamil Nadu Gaming Act, since there is no public place or public

street.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.22635 of 2024

11. In view of the aforesaid judgment and considering that there is

no specific mention by the respondents about the public place to attract he

provision under Section 12 of the Gaming Act, the pending First

Information Report in Crime No.414 of 2020 on the file of the first

respondent is liable to be quashed.

12. Accordingly this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the

First Information Report in Crime No.414 of 2020 on the file of the first

respondent is hereby quashed as against this petitioner. Consequently,

connected miscellaneous petition is closed.




                                                                                   20.02.2025

                     NCC      : Yes/No
                     Index    : Yes / No
                     Internet : Yes / No
                     aav

                     To

                     1. The Inspector of Police
                        Airport Police Station
                        Trichy City

                     2.The Additional Public Prosecutor,
                       Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
                       Madurai.


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                          Crl.O.P.(MD)No.22635 of 2024


                                               P.DHANABAL,J.

                                                                 aav




                                  Crl.O.P.(MD)No.22635 of 2024




                                                        20.02.2025





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter