Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Mathankumar vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu
2025 Latest Caselaw 2921 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2921 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 February, 2025

Madras High Court

S.Mathankumar vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 18 February, 2025

                                                                           W.P.(MD)No.3047 of 2025

                        BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED: 18.02.2025

                                                     CORAM:

                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH

                                            W.P.(MD)No.3047 of 2025
                                    and WMP (MD) Nos.2120 & 2122 of 2025


                     S.Mathankumar                                             : Petitioner


                                                        Vs.




                     1. The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                     Represented by its Principal Secretary,
                     Municipal Administration and Water
                     Supply Department,
                     Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

                     2. The Commissioner of Municipal
                     Administration and Water Supply Department,
                     Ezhilagam Annexue Building,
                     6th Floor, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.

                     3. The District Collector / Inspector of Panchayat,
                     Madurai District, Madurai 625 020.

                     4. The Commissioner,
                     Madurai City Municipal Corporation,
                     Madurai.

                     5. Earkudi Achampathu Village Panchayat,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

                     1/8
                                                                           W.P.(MD)No.3047 of 2025

                     Represented by its Secretary,
                     Achampathu, Madurai 625 019,
                     Madurai District.                                       : Respondents

                     PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the
                     records pertaining to the impugned Government Order in G.O.(MS).No.
                     201, (Municipal and Water Supply (Election) Department, dated
                     31.12.2024, issued by the 1st respondent and quash the same in so far as
                     Earkudi Achampathu Village Panchayat in Serial No. xv for merging with
                     the 4th Respondent Madurai Municipal Corporation is concerned and
                     direct to hold election to the 5th respondent Panchayat without any
                     further delay.
                                  For Petitioner   : Mr.K.P.S.Palanivel Rajan
                                                    Senior Counsel
                                                    for Mr.M.Karthikeya Venkitachalapathy
                                  For Respondents : Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan
                                                    Addl.Govt.Pleader for R1 to R3 & R5
                                                    Mr.S.Vinayak for R4



                                                    ORDER

The present writ petition has been filed challenging the

Government Order in G.O.(MS).No.201, Municipal and Water Supply

(Election) Department, dated 31.12.2024, issued by the first respondent.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner

submits that the petitioner has challenged Government Order No. 201,

dated 31.12.2024, primarily on the ground that the order was not passed

in accordance with the procedures mandated under Article 166 of the

Constitution of India. Article 166 outlines the procedures and

responsibilities regarding executive actions taken by the Governor of a

State and the authority for handling matters related to the State

government. By virtue of the said Government Order, the Village

Panchayat could not be brought into the territorial jurisdiction of the fifth

respondent without adhering to the requirements stipulated under Article

243(Q)(2) of the Constitution of India, which governs the process of

upgrading rural areas to urban areas. Learned Senior Counsel, therefore,

contended that the Government Order is in gross violation of Article 166,

and as such, it cannot be acted upon. In this regard, the learned Senior

Counsel also relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court in Champa Lal

v. State of Rajasthan & Ors., reported in (2018) 16 SCC 356.

3. Per contra, the learned Additional Government Pleader

appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 and 5 submitted that an

earlier decision by a Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court had already https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

addressed the very same issue in W.A(MD) No.1714 of 2025 on

23.01.2025.

4. Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the

petitioner, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on

behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 and 5 and the learned counsel appearing

for the fourth respondent.

5. Admittedly, the very same Government Order was

challenged before the Division Bench and this Court, passed the

following order:

“ By consent of both sides, the writ petition itself is

taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

2.Though the petitioner has sought for a larger relief to

quash the impugned order of the first respondent dated

31.12.2024, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner

would submit that the petitioner has given his objections

against the proposed merger of Kovilpappakudi Village with

the Madurai Municipal Corporation and that he would be

satisfied if his objections are directed to be considered.

3.Mr.S.Vinayak, learned Standing Counsel, who accepts https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

notice for the Madurai Corporation submits that the

notification was issued on 31.12.2024 and six [6] weeks time

has been given for filing of objections and the six [6] weeks

period is yet to expire.

4.In the light of the submissions made by the learned

Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner, liberty is hereby

granted to the petitioner to further give his objections within a

period of six [6] weeks from the date of the notification and on

receipt of the same, the respondents shall consider the same

and pass orders on merits and pass appropriate orders in

accordance with law.

5.With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands

disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.”

6. In the aforesaid order, this Court granted liberty to the

petitioner therein to raise all his objections before the respondents. In

line with the order of the Division Bench, this Court directs the petitioner

to submit all his objections before the respondents within a period of four

weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The respondents

shall consider such objections and pass appropriate orders in accordance

with law.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

7. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

18.02.2025

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PKN

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

To

1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

2. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Ezhilagam Annexue Building, 6th Floor, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.

3. The District Collector / Inspector of Panchayat, Madurai District, Madurai 625 020.

4. The Commissioner, Madurai City Municipal Corporation, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.

PKN

18.02.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter