Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The General Manager vs M. Shanmugam
2025 Latest Caselaw 2845 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2845 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 February, 2025

Madras High Court

The General Manager vs M. Shanmugam on 14 February, 2025

Author: R.Subramanian
Bench: R.Subramanian
                                                                                      W.A.No.227 of 2025


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                      DATED: 14.02.2025

                                                          CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
                                                     AND
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN

                                                 W.A.No. 227 of 2025
                                               and CMP No.1612 of 2025

                     The General Manager,
                     Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
                     (Villupuram Div. II) Ltd.
                     Vellore.                                                  ...Appellant

                                                               Vs.
                     1. M. Shanmugam
                        Chathiram Street,
                        Damal Post, Kancheepuram District.

                     2. The Joint Commissioner of Labour,
                        (Conciliation)
                        Chennai 600 006.                                       ...Respondents


                     Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, to set aside

                     the order dated 18.08.2023 passed in WP No.15769 of 2012.


                                      For Appellant      : T. Chandrasekaran

                                                        ****


                     1/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                       W.A.No.227 of 2025


                                                       JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)

The Transport Corporation is on Appeal challenging the orders of the

Writ Court directing regularization of the services of the petitioner with

effect from 01.09.2005 in the time scale of pay applicable to the post of

driver and pay all arrears of salary and consequential benefits.

2. The workman was appointed, temporarily, as a driver. Since there

was an accident while he was in service he was disengaged with effect from

12.10.2003. This disengagement prompted the workman to raise an

Industrial Dispute. The Corporation sought for approval of the

disengagement/discharge under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes

Act, 1947.

3. The Joint Commissioner of Labour refused approval on

12.02.2005, the order rejecting approval was not challenged. The petitioner

sought for reinstatement vide his representation dated 30.05.2005. Since the

said request was not considered, the petitioner moved this Court seeking a

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Mandamus directing reinstatement with all consequential benefits. Pending

the said writ petition, the workman was engaged as a casual labourer and he

continued to work as a driver till date of his reinstatement. In as much as his

services were not regularized despite passage of time, the petitioner was

forced to move this Court again in WP No.15769 of 2012.

4. Before the Writ Court, the Management did not dispute the fact

that the workman has been working through out as a driver. Therefore,

taking note of the fact that there is a 12(3) settlement dated 31.08.2005 in

and by which the workman would be entitled to be regularized as a driver,

the Writ Court had allowed the Writ Petition. Aggrieved the Management

has come up with this Appeal.

5. We have heard Mr.T.Chandrasekaran, learned counsel appearing

for the Management/appellant.

6. We do not find any merit in the Appeal. Admittedly the petitioner

was and is working as a driver in the Corporation and it is not in dispute

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

that his case is covered by 12(3) settlement dated 31.08.2005. The rejection

of approval of his discharge has also become final. Therefore, the

Corporation has no other option but to regularize the services of the

petitioner.

7. Mr.T.Chandrasekaran, learned counsel would however point out

that there is a dispute regarding back wages payable and a Review Petition

is pending in Review Application No.69 of 2012, in which review of the

order in WP No.35965 of 2005 dated 28.11.2011 has been sought for to the

extent it directed payment of arrears of back wages. We make it clear that

the payment of any benefits to the workman consequent upon regularization

will be subject to the result of the Review Petition.

8. The Writ Appeal is therefore dismissed. There shall be no order as

to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

(R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) (G. ARUL MURUGAN, J.) 14.02.2025 jv

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Index : No Neutral Citation : No Speaking order

To

1. The Joint Commissioner of Labour, (Conciliation) Chennai 600 006.

2. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram Div. II) Ltd.

Vellore.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

and G. ARUL MURUGAN, J.

jv

14.02.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter