Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.Arunambigai vs Idol Sri Kalyanapasupatheeswarar
2025 Latest Caselaw 6099 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6099 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 August, 2025

Madras High Court

M.Arunambigai vs Idol Sri Kalyanapasupatheeswarar on 28 August, 2025

                                                                                       S.A.(MD) No.165 of 2025

                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED: 28.08.2025

                                                         CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE

                                            S.A.(MD) No.165 of 2025
                                                     and
                                         CMP(MD)Nos.6310 & 11929 of 2025

                       M.Arunambigai
                       W/o.Mohan,
                       No.8, Srirama Nivas, Ii Floor,
                       KCP Layout, Anna Nagar,
                       Karur Taluk and District. ... Appellant/Appellant / Claimant/3rd Party

                                                                       Vs.

                       1. Idol Sri Kalyanapasupatheeswarar,
                         Sri Kalayan Pasupatheeswaraswamy
                         Devasthanam, Karur,
                         Rep by its Executive Officer. ... 1st Respondent / 1st Respondent/
                                                        1st Respondent/Decree holder/ Plaintiff

                       2. Valarmathi
                          D/o.Late.Marappa Gounder,
                          Periyakothur, L.N.S. Post,
                          Karur Taluk and District. ... 2nd Respondent/ 2nd Respondent/
                                                  2nd Respondent/Judgment Debtor/ Defendant


                       PRAYER in SA: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil
                       Procedure Code, to set aside the Judgment and decree dated 18.03.2025
                       passed in A.S.No.24 of 2024 on the file of the Additional Sub Court,


                       1/8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 28/08/2025 04:40:02 pm )
                                                                                        S.A.(MD) No.165 of 2025

                       Karur confirming the fair and decretal order dated 23.01.2024 passed in
                       E.A.No.12 of 2015 in E.P.No.113 of 2012 in O.S.No.444 of 2002 on the
                       file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Karur, by allowing this
                       Second Appeal and thus render justice.


                       PRAYER in CMP(MD)No.11929 of 2025:
                                  To pass an order to receive and mark the additional document
                       mentioned in the petition and mark the same as Ex.P10 and Ex.P11 on
                       the side of this petitioner/appellant/claimant under Order 41 Rule 27
                       read with Rule 28 of CPC, 1908 and pass such or further orders as this
                       Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and
                       circumstances of the case and thus render justice.


                       PRAYER in CMP(MD)No.6310 of 2025:
                                  To pass an order of interim stay of all further proceedings of
                       the Execution Petition in E.P.No.113 of 2012 on the file of the Principal
                       District Munsif Court, Karur, pending disposal of the main Second
                       Appeal and thus render justice.


                                  For Appellant          : Mr.J.Bharathan, Advocate
                                                          for Mr.P.Samuel Gunasingh

                                  For Respondents        : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan, Advocate
                                                          for Mr.P.Athimoolapandian,
                                                          Advocate for R1




                       2/8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis               ( Uploaded on: 28/08/2025 04:40:02 pm )
                                                                                        S.A.(MD) No.165 of 2025

                                                         JUDGMENT

Heard.

2. This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code

of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the Judgment and Decree dated

18.03.2025 passed in A.S.No.24 of 2024 on the file of the Additional

Sub Court, Karur confirming the fair and decretal order dated

23.01.2024 passed in E.A.No.12/2015 in E.P.No.113/2012 in O.S.No.

444/2002 by the learned Principal District Munsif Court, Karur.

3. The appellant, claiming to have purchased the suit property

under a sale deed dated 23.05.2002, resisted delivery in execution

proceedings initiated by the respondent temple. Her claim was based on

a patta issued by the Settlement Tahsildar on 17.10.1967 in favour of

Marappa Gounder and Palaniyappa Gounder.

4. The trial court dismissed her obstruction petition, holding

that the property is Devadayam Inam belonging to the respondent

temple as evidenced by the Inam Fair Register and Resettlement

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/08/2025 04:40:02 pm )

Register, and that the Settlement Tahsildar’s order under Section 8(1) of

the Tamil Nadu Minor Inams (Abolition) Act, 1963 was invalid.

5. The appellate court confirmed the dismissal, holding that

even assuming the patta was valid, the appellant had failed to prove

continuity of title from the patta-holders to her vendors, and further that

retrospective ratification granted by the Commissioner of H.R. & C.E.

validated the filing of the suit by the Executive Officer.

6. The Inam Fair Register (IFR), prepared during the Inam

Commission enquiries of the 19th century, categorically records the suit

property as Devadayam Inam granted for the performance of services in

Pasupathiswaraswamy Temple. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has held

that entries in the IFR are “great acts of the State” and constitute

unimpeachable evidence of the nature of the grant [Subramania

Gurukkal (dead) through Muthusubramania Gurukkal & Others v.

Shri Patteswaraswami Devasthanam Perur, by its Executive Officer

& Others1996 (1) LW 166].

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/08/2025 04:40:02 pm )

7. The trial court, relying on the Inam Fair Register and

Resettlement Register, held that the suit property was Devadayam Inam

belonging to the respondent temple and that the Settlement Tahsildar

had no jurisdiction to issue patta under Section 8(1) of the Tamil Nadu

Minor Inams (Abolition) Act, 1963. It therefore concluded that the patta

dated 17.10.1967 in favour of Marappa and Palaniyappa Gounder was

invalid in law, since for religious institutions only Section 8(2) applies.

The appellate court, while not disturbing this conclusion, further

observed that even assuming the patta to be valid, the appellant had in

any event failed to establish a lawful chain of title from the pattadars to

her vendors. Thus, both courts below, though resting on different

strands of reasoning, have rightly rejected the appellant’s claim, and

their findings are in accordance with law and supported by evidence.

8. The contention regarding retrospective ratification by the

Commissioner validating the suit by the Executive Officer has also

been rightly upheld by the courts below in light of binding precedents.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/08/2025 04:40:02 pm )

9. In the considered view of this Court, no substantial

question of law arises for determination. The concurrent findings of the

courts below are legally correct and do not suffer from perversity.

10. Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed at the

admission stage itself. No costs. Consequently, connected

Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

                       Speaking    : Yes / No                                                       28.08.2025
                       NCC         : Yes / No
                       Internet    : Yes / No
                       Index       : Yes / No
                       LS

                       Copy to:

                       1.The Additional Sub Court,
                        Karur.

                       2.The Principal District Munsif Court,
                       Karur

                       3.The Section Officer
                         V.R.Section,
                         Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
                         Madurai.







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                  ( Uploaded on: 28/08/2025 04:40:02 pm )










https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/08/2025 04:40:02 pm )

DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.

LS

28.08.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/08/2025 04:40:02 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter