Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 87 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2025
W.A.No.2862 of 2024
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.04.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
W.A.No.2862 of 2024
and
C.M.P.No.21084 of 2024
1.The Director of School Education,
DPI Buildings, College Road,
Chennai - 6.
2.The Chief Educational Officer,
Thirupattur.
3.The District Educational Officer,
Thirupattur. ... Appellants
versus
1.E.Sujatha,
Record Clerk,
Hindu Higher Secondary School,
Karumbur Village and Post,
Thuthipet - 635 811.
2.Hindu Higher Secondary School,
Rep. by its Secretary,
Karumbur Village and Post,
Thuthipet - 635 811. ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, to set aside
the order passed in W.P.No.22177 of 2023 dated 31.01.2024.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/04/2025 04:17:42 pm )
W.A.No.2862 of 2024
For Appellants : Mr.U.M.Ravichandran
Special Government Pleader
For Respondents : Mr.S.N.Ravichandran - R1
Mr.B.Gopalakrishnan - R2
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)
Aggrieved by the order in W.P.No.22177 of 2023 dated 31.01.2024,
the State is on appeal.
2. The writ court had while quashing the order dated 30.06.2023
impugned in the writ petition rejecting the approval of the appointment of
the first respondent as a Record Clerk in the second respondent School, had
directed the Government to approve the appointment.
3. The main contention of the appellants was that on the date
when the approval was taken up, the student strength in the school was
below the required limit and therefore, the approval was rejected. The writ
court found that the first respondent was appointed in a vacancy to the
sanctioned post that arose in the year 2018-2019 merely because the
approval was taken up a little later, the appellants cannot reject the approval.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/04/2025 04:17:42 pm )
4. Once it is found that the school had enough students at the time
when the appointment was made, rejection of approval on the ground that
the student strength has gone down in the subsequent years cannot be
justified.
5. Hence, we do not find any merit in the Writ Appeal. The Writ
Appeal therefore fails and it is accordingly dismissed. The appellants will
disburse the salary due to the first respondent within a period of eight (8)
weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
(R.S.M., J.) (G.A.M., J.)
01.04.2025
Speaking order
Index : No
Neutral Citation : No
sri
To
1.The Director of School Education, DPI Buildings, College Road, Chennai - 6.
2.The Chief Educational Officer, Thirupattur.
3.The District Educational Officer,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/04/2025 04:17:42 pm )
Thirupattur.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/04/2025 04:17:42 pm )
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
and G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.
sri
and
01.04.2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 08/04/2025 04:17:42 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!