Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. National Insurance Company ... vs R.Venkatesan
2024 Latest Caselaw 20713 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 20713 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 October, 2024

Madras High Court

M/S. National Insurance Company ... vs R.Venkatesan on 23 October, 2024

Author: R. Hemalatha

Bench: R. Hemalatha

                                                                                C.M.A.No.241 of 2017
                                                                           and C.M.P.No.1561 of 2017


                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED: 23.10.2024

                                                        CORAM:

                              THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA

                                                   CMA.No.241 of 2017
                                                          and
                                                  C.M.P.No.1561 of 2017

                  M/s. National Insurance Company Limited,
                  Salem - 1.                                              ... Appellant
                                                   .Vs.

                  1.R.Venkatesan
                  2.S.Vijay Venkatesh
                  3.Maheswari
                  4.Shriram General Insurance Company Limited,
                  RICO Industrial Estate,
                  Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302 022.                            ... Respondents



                  PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the
                  Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Award dated 06.10.2012 in
                  M.C.O.P.195 of 2010 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, II
                  Additional Sub Court, Salem.


                                  For Appellant      : Mr.K.Padmanabhan
                                  For RR1 to 3       : No appearance
                                  For R4             : Ms.R.Sreevidhya


                  1/11
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                           C.M.A.No.241 of 2017
                                                                                      and C.M.P.No.1561 of 2017




                                                       JUDGMENT

The appellant, the National Insurance Company Limited, Salem,

is the second respondent in M.C.O.P.195 of 2010 on the file of the Motor

Accident Claims Tribunal, Salem. The first respondent filed the above said

claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act seeking

compensation of Rs.15,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in a road

accident that took place on 30.08.2009.

2. The brief case of the claimant is as follows :

On 30.08.2009, the claimant was travelling as a passenger in a

bus bearing Registration Number TN-30-AD-5332 on Salem - Attur road.

The driver of the bus drove the bus in a rash and negligent manner and hit a

lorry bearing Registration Number TN-28-AD-2601, as a result of which,

the claimant sustained injuries. He was immediately rushed to Government

Hospital, Attur. After getting first aid in the said hospital, he got himself

admitted in Ganga Medical Centre and Hospital Private Limited,

Coimbatore, where he was treated as an inpatient for eleven days.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3. According to the claimant, the rash and negligent driving of

the driver of the bus bearing Registration Number TN-30-AD-5332 was the

cause of the accident and that since the said bus was insured with the

present appellant, the National Insurance Company Limited, both the owner

of the bus and the insurer are jointly and severally liable to pay

compensation to him.

4. In the Tribunal, the owner of the bus, owner of the lorry and

the fourth respondent (insurer of the lorry) remained absent and were set ex

parte. The appellant, the National Insurance Company Limited contested

the claim petition on all the grounds available to the insurer under Section

170 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

5. The Tribunal, vide its orders dated 06.10.2012, fastened

negligence on the part of the driver of the bus bearing Registration Number

TN-30-AD-5332 and further held that the owner of the bus and the insurer

are jointly and severally liable to pay compensation of Rs.4,17,865/- to the

claimant, together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

of petition till the date of realisation. The Tribunal dismissed the claim

petition as against the owner of the lorry (third respondent) and its insurer

(fourth respondent).

6. Aggrieved over the quantum of compensation awarded by the

Tribunal, the present appeal is filed.

7. Heard Mr.K.Padmanabhan, learned counsel for the appellant

and Ms.R.Sreevidhya, learned counsel for the fourth respondent.

8. Mr.K.Padmanabhan, learned counsel for the appellant

contended that the Tribunal had awarded exorbitant amount of

Rs.2,00,000/- towards pain and sufferings and the same has to be scaled

down.

9. Though notice was served on the respondents 1 to 3 and their

names were also printed in the cause list, there is no representation on their

behalf.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

10. A perusal of the discharge summary (Ex.P3) issued by Ganga

Medical Centre and Hospital Private Limited, Coimbatore, shows that the

claimant had sustained the following injuries :

Diagnosis Dept.No.H/1575/09

1. 2 days old operated case of fracture olecranon with tension band wiring insitu

2. Comminuted fracture distal 1/3 of radius with K wire insitu

3. Multiple sutured wound present over posterior aspect of arm and dorsum of forearm

4. 5 cm sutured wound present over dorsum of right wrist

He was admitted as an inpatient from 02.09.2009 to 12.09.2009.

Dr.V.Muthusamy (P.W.2) assessed the partial permanent disability of the

claimant as 45%. It is pertinent to point out that P.W.2 is not the doctor

who gave treatment to the claimant. Under this circumstance, the Tribunal

reduced the disability to 30%. Since there is no functional disability, the

Tribunal fixed a sum of Rs.2,000/- per percentage of disability and awarded

a sum of Rs.60,000/- towards partial permanent disability, which cannot be

said to be on the higher side. It is true that the Tribunal had awarded an

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

exorbitant amount of Rs.2,00,000/- towards pain and sufferings and

therefore, it is scaled down to Rs.1,00,000/-. The following tabular column

would show the amount awarded by the Tribunal and the amount awarded

by this Court under various heads.

                           S.No          Heads             Amount awarded    Amount
                                                             by Tribunal  awarded by this
                                                                 (Rs)         Court
                                                                               (Rs)
                          1.       Transport          to             5,000/-           5,000/-
                                   Hospital
                          2.       Extra nourishment                 5,000/-           5,000/-
                          3.       Pain and sufferings            2,00,000/-       1,00,000/-
                          4.       Partial permanent               60,000/-          60,000/-
                                   disability
                          5.       Damage to clothes                 1,000/-           1,000/-
                          6.       Medical expenses               1,46,615/-       1,46,615/-
                          7.       X-ray bill                         250/-               250/-
                                     TOTAL                     Rs.4,17,865/-   Rs.3,17,865 /-




11. Thus, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is hereby

scaled down to Rs.3,17,865/- that would carry interest at the rate of 7.5%

per annum.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

12. In the result,

i. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed. No costs.

Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

ii. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal is hereby scaled down

to Rs.3,17,865/-.

iii. The appellant, the National Insurance Company Limited is directed

to deposit the modified award amount i.e. Rs.3,17,865/- (less the

amount already deposited) together with interest at the rate of 7.5%

per annum from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit

within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of

this order / uploading of this order to the credit of M.C.O.P.195 of

2010 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, II

Additional Sub Court, Salem.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

iv. On such deposit being made, the claimant / first respondent is

permitted to withdraw the same with accrued interest and costs, after

following due process of law.

23.10.2024

Index : Yes/No Speaking / Non-speaking order mtl

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

To

1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, II Additional Sub Court, Salem.

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.

3.Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, RICO Industrial Estate, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302 022.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R. HEMALATHA, J.

mtl

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

23.10.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter