Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Dr.K.Neduchezhian
2024 Latest Caselaw 20599 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 20599 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 October, 2024

Madras High Court

The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Dr.K.Neduchezhian on 30 October, 2024

Author: R.Suresh Kumar

Bench: R.Suresh Kumar, C.Saravanan

                                                                                       T.C.A.No.248 of 2024

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                        DATED : 30.10.2024

                                                            CORAM

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
                                               and
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

                                                     T.C.A.No.248 of 2024
                                                            and
                                                    C.M.P.No.23110 of 2024

                The Commissioner of Income Tax,
                Central Circle-1,
                Salem.                                                        ...      Appellant
                                                             -Vs-

                Dr.K.Neduchezhian                                   ...    Respondent
                PRAYER : Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act,
                1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'D' Bench,
                Chennai dated 25.05.2022 in I.T(SS)A No.2/Chny/2018.


                                    For Appellant       :    Mrs.R.Hemalatha
                                                             Senior Standing Counsel

                                                       JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)

This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue calling in question

the correctness of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,

Chennai by raising the following substantial questions of law:

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case the ITAT was right in deleting the additions made on investments made on account sand quarrying which is in benami nature of AOP's and its member who exist only on paper and investment in their names belong to the assessee as confessed by the assessee u/s.132(4) on 12.12.2002?

2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case the ITAT was right in not considering the evidentiary value and the veracity of the affidavits declaring the undisclosed income voluntarily furnished on 18.12.2002 by the assessee as well as by the third parties which themselves are supported in turn by the statements deposed by them on 12.12.2002 under Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act?

3. Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case the ITAT was right in shifting the onus on the department without deliberating the failure on the part of the assessee by not furnishing any material evidences in support of his retraction against the primary evidences being his sworn statement deposed u/s.132(4) of the Income Tax Act as well as the affidavit voluntarily filed by them?

2. It is brought to our notice by the learned Senior Standing Counsel for https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

the appellant Revenue that in the instant case, as per the CBDT's Circular No.9

of 2024 dated 17.09.2024 the tax effect is said to be less than the monetary limit

imposed and therefore, the appeal can be disposed of, keeping the substantial

questions of law raised in this appeal open for adjudication at a later point of

time.

3. Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned Senior

Standing Counsel for the appellant Revenue, this Tax Case Appeal is dismissed

for low tax effect, keeping open the substantial questions of law for adjudication

at appropriate stage. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently,

connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

                                                              (R.S.K., J.)          (C.S.N., J.)
                                                                         30.10.2024
                                                                             (2/2)
                NCC : Yes / No
                Index : Yes / No
                Speaking Order : Yes / No
                vji
                To

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'D' Bench, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.SURESH KUMAR, J.

and C.SARAVANAN, J.

vji

and

30.10.2024 (2/2)

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter