Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 20317 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 October, 2024
C.R.P.(MD)No.2687 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 25.10.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
C.R.P.(MD)No.2687 of 2024
and
C.M.P.(MD)No.15359 of 2024
N.Seenivasan ... Petitioner/Petitioner /Appellant
Vs.
S.Mahendhiraraj ... Respondent / Respondent / Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India, as against the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.5 of 2023 in
A.S.No.2 of 2022 on the file of the Sub Court, Sathur, dated 20.09.2024.
For Petitioner : Mr.H.Arumugam
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner. Issuance
of notice to the respondent is dispensed with.
2. The revision petitioner figured as defendant in O.S.No.41 of 2014 on
the file of the District Munsif Court, Sattur. In the said suit, the respondent
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
herein sought the relief of declaration and permanent injunction. The suit was
decreed. The counter claim was dismissed vide Judgment and decree dated
06.06.2019. Challenging the same, the petitioner herein filed A.S.No.2 of 2022
before the Sub Court, Sattur. The case of the revision petitioner is that the
jurisdictional Tahsildar recommended to the RDO for rectification of the
revenue record. The RDO however took the stand that only after disposal of
the civil suit, he can look into the matter. The revision petitioner is caught in a
bind. His success in the civil proceedings would depend upon the revenue
record. Therefore, the revision petitioner has filed W.P.(MD)No.18623 of 2023
challenging the stand of the RDO and seeking correction of the revenue record
in the light of the recommendation made by the jurisdictional Tahsildar. Citing
the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner herein filed I.A.No.5 of 2023
before the Sub Court, seeking stay of the appeal proceedings filed by him. The
court below vide order dated 20.09.2024 dismissed IA. Challenging the same,
this civil revision petition came to be filed.
3. There is some merit in the contention of the learned counsel appearing
for the revision petitioner. But then, I will not be justified in calling upon the
court below to wait for an indefinite period of time. It is for the petitioner to
get the writ petition speedily disposed of. In order to give breathing time to the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
petitioner herein, I direct the Sub Court, Sattur to keep A.S.No.2 of 2022 on
hold without taking up 'for final disposal' for a period of four months from
today. It is for the petitioner herein to expedite disposal of the writ petition in
the meanwhile.
4. The Civil Revision Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
25.10.2024
NCC : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
rmi
To:
The Sub Court, Sathur.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
rmi
25.10.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!