Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shanthi vs The Executive Officer
2024 Latest Caselaw 20121 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 20121 Mad
Judgement Date : 24 October, 2024

Madras High Court

Shanthi vs The Executive Officer on 24 October, 2024

Author: R.Subramanian

Bench: R.Subramanian

                                                                          C.M.P.(MD)No.15235 of 2024


                            BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED : 24.10.2024

                                                    CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
                                                     and
                                  THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI


                                           C.M.P.(MD)No.15235 of 2024
                                                       in
                                           W.A.(MD)SR.No.78258 of 2024

            Shanthi                                                 ... Petitioner / Appellant

                                                      -vs-
            1.The Executive Officer,
             Arulmighu Kathali Narasinga
               Perumal Temple,
             HR & CE Department,
             Ammaiyanaickanoor,
             Nilakkottai-624 208,
             Dindigul District.                               ... 1st Respondent / 1st
            Respondent                                                             / Petitioner

            2.G.Rajesh Kanna

            3.The District Collector,
             Collector Office,
             Maduai.

            4.The Joint Commissioner,
             HR & CE Department,
             Plot No.49, M.R.B.Nagar,
             Ammayanaickanoor,
             Nilakkottai-624 289,
             Dindigul District.

            5.The Tahsildar,
             Taluk Office, T.Vadipatti,
             Madurai District.                             ... Respondents 2 to 5 /
                                                        Respondents 2 to 5 / Respondents 1 to 4



            PRAYER in C.M.P.(MD)No.15235 of 2024: Petition filed under Under Section
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis


            page 1 of 4
                                                                          C.M.P.(MD)No.15235 of 2024
            151 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, to grant leave to the petitioner to file the writ
            appeal against W.M.P.(MD)No.17111 of 2024 in Rev.Aplw(MD)SR.No.60634 of
            2024 in W.P.(MD)No.2973 of 2023.


            PRAYER in W.A.(MD)No.SR78258 of 2024 : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15
            of Letters Patent Act, to set aside the order dated 28.08.2024 passed in W.M.P.
            (MD)No.17111 of 2024 in Rev.Aplw(MD)SR.No.60634 of 2024 in W.P.(MD)No.2973
            of 2023.


                            For Petitioner      : Mr.S.Krishna Kumar

                            For R-3 to R-5      : Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam,
                                                  Government Advocate



                                                       ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.]

The petitioner seeks leave to challenge the order passed in W.M.P.(MD)No.

17111 of 2024. The said application was filed seeking condonation of delay in

filing review. Since the review petitioner sought for a very minor correction in the

order, the writ Court allowed the application in the condone delay stage itself and

directed at the last sentence in the main order to be replaced. By the main order

dated 07.06.2023, the writ Court directed registration of a document executed by

the writ petitioner Mr.G.Rajesh Kanna, finding that the title of the mother of the

writ petitioner has been declared by this Court in S.A.(MD)No.632 of 1997 by

judgment dated 25.10.2018.

2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the brother, the second https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

page 2 of 4

respondent herein had suppressed the existence of the other legal heirs. It is also

stated that another sister of the petitioner has filed a partition suit, and the same

is pending at the numbering stage. Registration of a document by one of the legal

heirs by itself will not affect the title of the other legal heirs if they are entitled to

any right over the property. We make it clear that the registration of any

document executed by the second respondent will not affect the rights of the

petitioner or the other legal heirs of Saraswathi Ammal with whom the property

had vested.

3. Therefore, this petition is dismissed. The Writ Appeal in W.A.

(MD)No.SR78258 of 2024 stands rejected in the SR stage itself. There shall be no

order as to costs.

                                                       [R.S.M., J.]           [L.V.G., J.]
                                                                      24.10.2024
        NCC      : Yes/No
        Index    : Yes/No
        Internet : Yes
        Sml


        To

        1.The District Collector,
         Collector Office,
         Maduai.

        2.The Joint Commissioner,
         HR & CE Department,
         Plot No.49, M.R.B.Nagar,
         Ammayanaickanoor,
         Nilakkottai-624 289,
         Dindigul District.

            3.The Tahsildar,
             Taluk Office, T.Vadipatti,
             Madurai District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

page 3 of 4

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

and L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

Sml

in

24.10.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

page 4 of 4

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter