Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

D.Shally Roselind vs The Chief Educational Officer
2024 Latest Caselaw 20032 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 20032 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 October, 2024

Madras High Court

D.Shally Roselind vs The Chief Educational Officer on 23 October, 2024

Author: R.Vijayakumar

Bench: R.Vijayakumar

                                                                      W.P.(MD).No.23964 of 2024


                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED : 23.10.2024

                                                         CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

                                             W.P(MD)No.23964 of 2024
                                                      and
                                            W.M.P(MD) No.20296 of 2024


                     D.Shally Roselind,
                     Secondary Grade Teacher,
                     St.Andrew's Higher Secondary School,
                     Koodankulam,
                     Tirunelveli District.                                  ... Petitioner
                                                       Vs.

                     1. The Chief Educational Officer,
                        Tirunelveli,
                        Tirunelveli District.

                     2. The District Educational Officer,
                        (Secondary)
                        Tirunelveli,
                        Tirunelveli District.

                     3. The Correspondent,
                        St. Andrew's Higher Secondary School,
                        Koodankulam,
                       Tirunelveli District.                             ... Respondents




                     1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                               W.P.(MD).No.23964 of 2024




                     PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                     praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the
                     records relating to the impugned order in O.Mu.No.810/A2/2024, dated
                     26.07.2024 of the second respondent herein and quash the same and
                     consequently direct the respondents herein to award annual increments,
                     incentive, surrender leave benefits, selection grade pay an other attended
                     benefits to the petitioner from the date of petitioner's appointment w.e.f
                     07.11.2012 with all attendant benefits including pay fixation and allowance.


                                              For Petitioner       : Mr.T.Pon Ramkumar

                                              For R1 and R2        : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar
                                                                     Additional Government Pleader


                                                               ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed by a Secondary Grade Teacher

working in the third respondent School, challenging the order passed by the

second respondent herein, wherein the request of the petitioner for grant of

annual increments have been rejected on various grounds including the

reason for not clearing TET examination.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2. The Hon'ble Division Bench of our High Court in paragraph No.

74(c) of the judgment reported in 2023 (3) LW 112 (The Director of School

Education, D.P.I. Campus, College Road, Chennai -06 and two others Vs.

Velayutham and another) has categorically held that a pass in TET

examination is not mandatory for being appointed as teacher in a Minority

Institution. Therefore, a pass in TET examination is not required either for

appointment or for granting of annual increments to the writ petitioner.

3. As far as other reasons pointed out in the impugned order is

concerned, the Management is directed to furnish the copies of the documents

sought for by the educational authorities. The order impugned in the writ

petition is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the file of the second

respondent herein. The second respondent is directed to pass orders on merits

and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4. With the above said observations, this Writ Petition stands allowed.

There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous

Petition is closed.




                                                                                              23.10.2024
                     NCC      : Yes/No
                     Index    : Yes / No
                     Internet : Yes / No
                     ebsi



                     To

1. The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

2. The District Educational Officer, (Secondary) Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

3. The Correspondent, St. Andrew's Higher Secondary School, Koodankulam, Tirunelveli District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.

ebsi

23.10.2024

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter