Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19487 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2024
C.M.A.No.3057 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.10.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI
C.M.A.No.3057 of 2023
and
C.M.P.No.28870 of 2023
Maria Amal Raja,
S/o.Joseph Marimuthu ..Appellant
Vs.
Subhashini @ Jesika
D/o.Late Nagaraj ..Respondent
Prayer:
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of Family
Courts Act to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 09.12.2020 in
I.A.No.3978 of 2018 in O.P.No.795 of 2017 passed by the III Additional
Family Judge, Chennai.
For Appellant : Mr.P.Muthu Esakia
For Respondent : Mr.Suchit Anant Palande
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page 1/4
C.M.A.No.3057 of 2023
JUDGMENT
(The judgment of the Court was delivered by J.Nisha Banu,J and R.Kalaimathi,J.)
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the
appellant/husband challenging fair and decreetal order dated 09.12.2020
in I.A.No.3978 of 2018 in O.P.No.795 of 2017 passed by the III
Additional Family Judge, Chennai.
2. As per Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, an appeal against
the interlocutory application will not lie and an appeal will lie only as
against the judgment or order of the Family Court. Further, in the case of
G.V.N.S.Siva Prasad vs. V.Jyostna Devi made in C.M.A.No.1018 of
2022 dated 27.03.2024, the Division Bench of this Court, after referring
to the judgment of S.Menaka v. K.S.K. Nepolian Socraties and other
cases (Batch) reported in 2024:MHC:1405 (Neutral Citation of Madras
High Court) and 2024 Live Law (Mad) 126 held that as against the
interlocutory applications/ interim maintenance, only Civil Revision
Petition under 227 of the Constitution of India, would lie and not Civil
Miscellaneous Appeal.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
to withdraw this appeal. He has also made an endorsement to that effect
in the case bundle.
4. In the light of the aforesaid judgment and in view of the
endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this Civil
Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file Civil
Revision Petition. On filing of the CRP, for the purpose of limitation, the
period spent in prosecuting the CMA shall be excluded.
5. If the learned counsel for the appellant requests for return of
certified copy of the impugned order, the same shall be returned to him
forthwith under due acknowledgement. No costs. Consequently,
connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(J.N.B,J.) (R.K.M., J.)
Index : Yes / No 17.10.2024
Internet : Yes
vsi
To
The III Additional Family Judge, Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
J. NISHA BANU, J.
and R.KALAIMATHI,J.
vsi
17.10.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!