Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19234 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2024
S.A(MD)No.573 of 2005
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.10.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
S.A(MD)No.573 of 2005
1.Diwan Mohideen
2.Nainar Mohamed
3.Sethu Uthuman
4.Muthar Mohideen
5.Fathimal Beevi
6.Asanammal @ Mumtaj
7.Meeral
8.Rasul Beevi
9.Barakath
10.Kadeejal Beevi
11.Rahima Begum
12.Ayeeshal ... Appellant
Vs.
1.Thirumalaiyandi Konar
2.S.M.Rahmathullah ... Respondents
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil
Procedure against the judgment and decree, dated 09.02.2001 made in
A.S.No.44 of 1997, on the file of the Principal Sub-Court, Tenkasi
confirming the judgment and decree, dated 30.04.1996 made in
O.S.No.84 of 1993, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Shenkottai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
S.A(MD)No.573 of 2005
For Appellants : No appearance
For R1 : Dismissed
For R2 : No appearance
JUDGMENT
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 29.08.2024,
Mr.S.Ramesh @ Ramaish, learned counsel appearing for the appellants
submitted that he could not contact the parties and the lower Court
counsel is no more and hence, he is not in a position to get instructions
regarding the present status of the case. Further, Mr.C.Vakeeswaran,
learned counsel appearing for the second respondent reported 'no
instructions'. Hence, this Court directed the registry to issue notice to
the appellants and delete the name of Mr.C.Vakeeswaran and directed to
list the matter on 20.09.2024.
2. Again, when the matter was taken up for hearing on
20.09.2024, this Court further directed the Registry to print the names
of the appellants and post the matter on 24.09.2024 'for dismissal'. On
that day, at the request of the learned counsel appearing for the second
appellant, the matter is adjourned to 03.10.2024.
3. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, even though
the name of the appellants have been printed in the cause list, there is
no representation on behalf of the appellants and the respondents and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
the same clearly indicates that the appellants have not shown any
interest to prosecute the appeal any further. Hence, the Second Appeal
is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
03.10.2024
NCC : Yes/No
Index : Yes/No
am
To
1.The Principal Sub-Court,
Tenkasi.
2.The District Munsif Court,
Shenkottai.
3.The Record Keeper,
V.R. Section,
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.
am
Judgment made in
03.10.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!