Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Tamilvanan vs The Director
2024 Latest Caselaw 19227 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19227 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2024

Madras High Court

R.Tamilvanan vs The Director on 3 October, 2024

Author: N.Anand Venkatesh

Bench: N.Anand Venkatesh

                                                                           W.P.No.29078 of 2024

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 03.10.2024

                                                       CORAM

                          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

                                              W.P.No.29078 of 2024
                                                      and
                                             W.M.P.No.31730 of 2024

                     R.Tamilvanan                                               .. Petitioner

                                                         Vs.

                     1.The Director,
                       Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine,
                       Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.

                     2.The Joint Director (Administration),
                       Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine,
                       Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.

                     3.The Deputy Director of Health Services,
                       Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.                                    ..
                     Respondents

                     Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                     praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records
                     of the 1st respondent dated 07.01.2022 passed in R.No.90584/E4/S3/2021
                     and quash the same and consequently direct the 1 st respondent to appoint
                     the petitioner in the post of Junior Assistant with retrospective effect from
                     the date of appointment along with all backwages, continuity of service
                     and other benefit.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     1/6
                                                                                W.P.No.29078 of 2024

                                        For petitioner     :     Mr.V.S.Senthil Kumar

                                        For Respondents :        Mr.M.Bindran
                                                                 Additional Government Pleader

                                                           ORDER

This writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings of the

1st respondent dated 07.01.2022 and for a consequential direction to the

1st respondent to appoint the petitioner in the post of Junior Assistant with

retrospective effect from the date of his appointment along with all

attendant benefits.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Additional Government Pleader for the respondents.

3.The father of the petitioner was employed as Health Inspector

Grade-I in Government Primary Health Center, Nerumbur,

Thirukazhukundram. He died in harness on 05.01.2002. The petitioner

submitted an application seeking for compassionate appointment and the

3rd respondent through proceedings dated 18.11.2011, appointed the

petitioner as Mazdoor in the Primary Health Centre, Kelambakkam, with

effect from 01.12.2011.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

4.The grievance of the petitioner is that he had completed relevant

qualification and he was eligible to be appointed as Junior Assistant.

However, the petitioner has been given the lower most cadre. Hence, he

made a representation. The same was rejected by the 1st respondent

through proceedings dated 07.01.2022. Aggrieved by the same, the

present writ petition has been filed.

5.In the considered view of this Court, the order passed by the 1st

respondent does not suffer from any illegality. When the petitioner

accepted the appointment on compassionate ground, the petitioner was

aware of the fact that he was appointed as Mazdoor. Having entered

appointment, at a later point of time, the petitioner is now turning around

and seeking for a higher post from the date of his appointment. The same

has been rightly rejected by the 1st respondent. For proper appreciation,

paragraph No.8 of the order dated 07.01.2022 is extracted hereunder:

“8) In view of the facts and circumstances stated above in this case and also as per the Division Bench Judgment order dated : 13.02.2012 made in W.A.No.165 of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 mentioned above, Tihru.R.Tamilvanan S/o.Thiru.(late) M.Ramachandran is informed that in this case with all eyes open he had accepted the appointment given to him due to his indigent circumstances of the family and now requesting for appointment to the post of Junior Assistant with effect from the date of his appointment in the lower post on compassionate ground is against the principle of natural justice. He is further informed that by virtue of giving such application, he was able to secure the appointment on compassionate ground earlier than that the persons who opted to wait for their turn to be considered for appointment on compassionate ground. As such, Thiru.R.Tamilvanan, Son of Thiru.(late). M.Ramachandran is informed that he is not eligible for appointment to the post of Junior Assistant with effect from the date of his appointment in the lower post on compassionate ground as requested in his representation dated: 10.06.2016. However, he is further informed that he will get his chances of promotion to the post of Junior Assistant by the method of recruitment by transfer only as per the order of his seniority in lower post after the completion of seven years in the present post as per the Government orders in force.”

6.The 1st respondent has properly dealt with the representation

made by the petitioner and the petitioner has been informed that his claim

for Junior Assistant will be considered only according to his seniority. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

7.In the light of the above discussion, this Court does not find any

merits in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands

dismissed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

No costs.




                                                                                     03.10.2024
                                                                                          (½)

                     krk

                     Index                    : Yes / No
                     Internet                 : Yes / No
                     Neutral Citation         : Yes / No



                     To

                     1.The Director,

Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.

2.The Joint Director (Administration), Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.

3.The Deputy Director of Health Services, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

krk

03.10.2024 (½)

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter