Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8139 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 May, 2024
Crl. R.C.No. 1182 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Judgment Reserved on 13.09.2023
Judgment Pronounced on 29.05.2024
Coram
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
Crl.R.C.No.1182 of 2019
1.V.Manjula
2.Minor V.Vijaykanna
3.Minor V.Nandini .. Petitioners
Vs
K.Velmurugan .. Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C to call
for the records culminating in the Order dated 21.08.2019 passed in F.C.M.C.No.65
of 2017 by the learned Family Judge, Family Court, Vellore, Revise the same and
enhance the monthly maintenance amount awarded therein to Rs.20,000/- for the 1st
petitioner, Rs.15,000/-each to the 2nd and 3rd petitioners to be paid to them from the
date of filing of the said F.C.M.C.No.65 of 2017 and Rs.50,000/- towards litigation
expenses.
1/10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl. R.C.No. 1182 of 2019
For Petitioners .. Ms.S.Sweda
for Mr.A.Arun
For Respondent .. Mr.S.Deivasigamani
for MR.V.Arul
JUDGMENT
The Petitioners had preferred the Criminal Revision case to call for the
records culminating in the Order dated 21.08.2019 passed in F.C.M.C.No.65 of
2017 by the learned Family Judge, Family Court, Vellore, revise the same and
enhance the monthly maintenance amount awarded therein to Rs.20,000/- for the 1st
petitioner, Rs.15,000/-each to the 2nd and 3rd petitioners to be paid to them from the
date of filing of the said F.C.M.C.No.65 of 2017 and Rs.50,000/- towards litigation
expenses.
2. The learned Counsel appearing for the Revision Petitioner submitted that
the Revision Petitioner/Wife, who is the Petitioner in F.C.M.C.No.65 of 2017 before
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
the learned Judge, Family Court, Vellore. The Petitioner/Wife had examined herself
as P.W.1. The Senior Section Engineer of Katpadi Division under whom the
Respondent/Husband was working as Section Engineer, Signal and Communication
was examined as P.W-2. As per the evidence of P.W-2, the monthly salary of
Respondent is Rs.59,493/-. After deduction it is Rs.42,713/-. As per the Petitioner's
contention he is earning approximately Rs.60,000/- per month and through
agriculture and other source of income. He owns 4 acres of agricultural land and
building which is leased out for rent, through which his total income per month is at
Rs.1,20,000/- as per the claim petition.
3.After due enquiry, on appreciation of evidence, the learned Judge, Family
Court, had granted maintenance to the Petitioner and minor children as Petitioners 2
& 3. Accordingly, the learned Judge Family Court, Vellore, had granted a sum of
Rs.10,000/- as monthly maintenance for the 1st petitioner/wife and Rs.60,000/- to
the minor children per month and Rs.25,000/- towards litigation expenses.
Aggrieved by the same, the wife, who is the petitioner in F.C.M.C.No.65 of 2017 on
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
the file of the learned Judge, Family Court, Vellore, had preferred this Criminal
Revision Case seeking enhancement of the maintenance.
4. In F.C.M.C.No.65 of 2017 the wife had claimed a sum of Rs.25,000/- for
her and Rs.15,000/- for the children and Rs.50,000/- towards litigation expenses.
5.Considering the fact that the Petitioner was working as Technician under
the Senior Section Engineer, Signal Southern Railways, Katpadi Division, the Senior
Section Engineer, Southern Railways was examined as P.W.2. The learned Judge
had calculated the monthly income and granted Rs.10,000/- to the wife and
Rs.6000/- each to the minor children.
6.The learned Counsel for the Respondent/Husband submitted that what had
been calculated by the learned Judge, Family Court, Vellore, is a well reasoned
order and it does not warrant any interference by this Court. Further, he would
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
submit that during the pendency of this Criminal Revision Case, the 2nd
Petitioner/Son had attained age of majority.
7.When the case came up for hearing, on an earlier occasion i.e., 05.09.2023
the learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioner/Wife submitted that there had been
arrears of maintenance from the Respondent. The learned Counsel for the
Respondent disputed the claim stating that he had paid entire dues. Therefore, the
case was adjourned seeking particulars from the learned Counsel for the Revision
Petitioner/Wife and learned Counsel for the Respondent. This Court had also sought
remarks from the learned Judge, Family Court, Vellore, regarding the amount
already deposited before the Court concerned in C.M.P.No.45 of 2022 filed by the
Revision Petitioner on behalf of herself and minor children.
8.Accordingly, the learned Judge, Family Court, Vellore in letter in
D.No.919/2023 dated 12.09.2023 had reported that the Respondent/Husband had
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
paid amounts as extracted hereunder:
''9.The 3rd minor petitioner has preferred C.M.P.No238 of 2022 for the period of 01.09.2021 to 31.07.2022 for Rs.6,000 x 11 months=Rs.66,000/-. The respondent has paid Rs.56,000/- till 7.09.2023 and the balance is Rs.10,000/-. The petition is pending for payment.''
9.Therefore, out of the litigation expenses only Rs.14,000/- had been
deposited.
Point for consideration
Whether the order passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Vellore in F.C.M.C.No.65 of 2017 dated 21.08.2019 is to be enhanced?
10. On consideration of the rival submissions, it is found that on the basis of
due enquiry conducted before the learned Judge, Family Court, Vellore, the Senior
Section Engineer, Southern Railways, Katpadi who was examined as P.W-2 had
stated that the Respondent in this case, the husband of the first Petitioner and father
of the Petitioners 2 and 3 was working as Technician (Signal and Communication
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Department of Southern Railways) at Katpadi. Therefore, his Senior Section
Engineer (Signals) was summoned as P.W-2. He had clearly deposed that the take-
home salary of the first Respondent, the husband of the first Petitioner is
Rs.47,000/-. Therefore, the learned Judge, Family Court had granted a decree for
maintenance by granting Rs.10,000/- as monthly maintenance for the mother and
Rs.6,000/- each for the minor sons/Petitioners 2 and 3. In this case, the Revision
was filed by the wife seeking enhancement of the maintenance from the meagre
amount granted by the learned Judge, Family Court, Vellore is Rs.10,000/- to
Rs.20,000/- to the first Petitioner; from Rs.6,000/- to Rs.15,000/- to minor
Petitioners 2 and 3 and from Rs.25,000/- to Rs.50,000/- for litigation expenses. As
per his claim, the Petitioners are to be paid maintenance as the husband/first
Respondent is earning Rs.47,000/-. When the Revision Petition was pending, the
elder son of the Petitioner had attained the age of majority. Therefore, he need not
be paid for his maintenance.
11. The submission of the learned Counsel for the Respondent/husband that
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
what was awarded by the learned Judge, Family Court is a reasonable Order which
does not warrant interference will not hold good in this case. As per the evidence of
Senior Section Engineer, the husband of the first Petitioner and father of the minors
2 and 3, the Respondent was serving in the Southern Railways under the Senior
Section Engineer as a Technician. His salary was Rs.59,493/- in the month of 2018.
After deduction, it was Rs.42,713/-. Therefore, the maintenance for the wife is
enhanced from 10,000/- to Rs.15,000/-. Litigation Expenses is enhanced from
25,000/- to Rs.50,000/-.
12. Considering the claim of enhancement, the maintenance of the wife alone
is enhanced by Rs.15,000/-. The Order passed by the learned Judge, Family Court,
Vellore regarding monthly maintenance for the minor children are maintained as
such. Litigation Expenses is enhanced from Rs.25,000/- to Rs.50,000/-.
13. In the light of the above discussion, the point for consideration is
answered in favour of the Petitioners and against the Respondent.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
14. In the light of the above, the amount is modified as follows:
The monthly maintenance of wife will be Rs.15,000/- p.m.,
The maintenance already granted to the children/Petitioners 2 and 3 are
maintained as such. There is no enhancement. Litigation Expenses is enhanced
from Rs.25,000/- to Rs.50,000/-.
In the result, this Criminal Revision case is partly allowed. The order passed
by the learned Judge, Family Court, Vellore in F.C.M.C.No.65 of 2017 dated
21.08.2019 is modified. The monthly maintenance of wife will be Rs.15,000/- p.m.
The maintenance already granted to the children/Petitioners 2 and 3 are
maintained as such. There is no enhancement. Litigation Expenses is enhanced
from Rs.25,000/- to Rs.50,000/-
29.05.2024 vsn/dh Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP.J ,
vsn/dh
To The Judge, Family Court, Vellore.
Judgment made in
29.05.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!