Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 423 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2024
WA No.830 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.01.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
WA No.830 of 2021
M/s.Super Sales India Ltd.,
Rep. by its Authorised Signatory and
Senior Manager-Finance, Mr.S.Ravindran,
34-A, Kamaraj Road, Coimbatore 641 018. .. Appellant
-vs-
1. The State of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. by its Secretary,
Local Administration Department,
Fort St. George, Chennai 600 109.
2. The President,
V.Vavipalayam Panchayat,
V.Vavipalayam 641 671. .. Respondents
Prayer: Writ appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent
against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 23.07.2019
passed in W.P.No.6542 of 2007.
For the Appellant : Mr.Anirudh Krishnan
For the Respondents : Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath
Govt. Advocate for R-1
: No appearance for R-2
*****
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WA No.830 of 2021
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
We have heard Mr.Anirudh Krishnan, learned counsel for the
appellant and Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath, learned Government Advocate
for the first respondent.
2.The appellant/original petitioner had filed the writ petition
challenging the demand notice dated 23.12.2006 directing the
petitioner to pay corporate tax in respect of 34 numbers of Windmill.
The writ petition was dismissed. Aggrieved thereby, the present
appeal.
3. On the earlier date, we had asked the learned Advocate for
the State to make submissions as to how the impugned notice would
conform to the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994.
4. The learned Government Advocate, on instructions, submits
that the said demand notice does not have any basis under the law.
Reference is made to Sections 171 and 172 of the Act.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
5. As rightly conceded by the learned Government Advocate,
the impugned notice would not be referable to any provisions under
the Act. The impugned notice is, accordingly, quashed and set aside.
Inter alia, the impugned judgment of the learned Single Judge is also
set aside.
6. It is made clear that it would be open for the authorities in
appropriate cases to levy the tax in accordance with law and as
permissible.
The writ appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. There shall be no
order as to costs.
(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.)
05.01.2024
Index : Yes/No
Neutral Citation : Yes/No
sra
To
1. The Secretary to Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Local Administration Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 109.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
(sra)
05.01.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!