Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 305 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2024
W.A.No.961 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.01.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
and
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
W.A.No.961 of 2020
and C.M.P.No.11606 of 2020
The Secretary,
Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission,
Represented by its Secretary,
TNPSC Road,
V.O.C.Nagar,
Park Town, Chennai – 600 003. ...Appellant
vs.
K.Sangeetha ...Respondent
Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act, being
aggrieved by the order dated 13.12.2018 of the learned Single Judge made in
W.P.No.32998 of 2018 on the file of this Court.
For Appellant : Mrs.G.Hema
For Respondent : No appearance
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
W.A.No.961 of 2020
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.KUMARESH BABU, J.)
This Intra Court Appeal has been preferred by the Tamil Nadu Public
Service Commission as being aggrieved against the order of the learned Single
Judge directing the appellant to permit the respondent to participate in the
counselling and declare the final results.
2.We have heard Mrs.G.Hema, learned counsel appearing for the
appellant. In spite of notice being served on the respondent, the respondent had
neither appeared in person nor represented by a counsel.
3.At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the
issue in this Writ Appeal is no longer res integra in view of a judgment of the
Division Bench made in W.A.No.3768 of 2019 dated 05.09.2023.
4.The aforesaid Division Bench judgment relied upon by the learned
counsel for the appellant was a judgment made by the Division Bench of which
we were part. After examining the issue involved in the Writ Appeal which is
similar to that in this Writ Appeal and after considering the various Division
Bench Judgments of this Court and also the Hon'ble Apex Court, had come to a https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis conclusion that if the mandatory instructions given by the Service Commission
had not been followed in filling up the applications or if wrong claim or
incorrect particulars have been given in the said application, the same is liable to
be rejected and that the sympathy factor cannot override a legal position.
5.We see no reason to differ from our earlier decision made in
W.A.No.3768 of 2019 dated 05.09.2023.
6.In the result, the Writ Appeal is allowed and the order impugned in the
Writ Petition is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the
connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(R.S.K.,J.) (K.B.,J.)
04.01.2024
Index: yes/no
Speaking order:yes/no
Neutral Citation:yes/no
pam
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.
and
K.KUMARESH BABU, J.
Pam
04.01.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!