Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 285 Mad
Judgement Date : 4 January, 2024
WA No.1491 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.01.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
WA No.1491 of 2023
and CMP No.14409 of 2023
K.R.Sri Raman .. Appellant
-vs-
1. The District Collector,
Office of the District Collector,
Cuddalore District, Tamilnadu.
2. The Commissioner of Land Administration,
Chepauk, Chennai, Tamilnadu.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Office of the RDO, Chidambaram,
Cuddalore District, Tamilnadu. .. Respondents
Prayer: Writ appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent
against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 25.11.2021
passed in W.P.No.15302 of 2019.
For the Appellant : Ms.Abirame
For the Respondents : Mr.P.Muthukumar,
State Government Pleader
*****
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WA No.1491 of 2023
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
We have heard Ms.Abirame, learned counsel for the appellant
and Mr.P.Muthukumar, learned State Government Pleader, for the
respondents.
2. The learned counsel for the appellant contends that the writ
petition was filed by the appellant/writ petitioner to direct the
respondents to consider the representation given by the petitioner for
carrying out the correction of entry of new survey number as 323/1
instead of wrong entry as S.No.303/11. It is submitted that patta
was issued to the writ petitioner in respect of S.No.82/1, however,
the new survey number was wrongly mentioned as 303/11. The
same ought to be 323/1. According to the learned counsel, this
discrepancy has not been considered. To buttress her submission,
the learned counsel relies upon the information received under Right
to Information Act from the Office of the Tahsildar. On a query raised
by the writ petitioner, the answer given was that as per the FMB copy
of Melbhuvanagiri Village, Bhuvanagiri Taluk, for S.No.323/1, old
survey number is 82/1.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3. Considering the dispute involved in the matter, it would only
be the revenue authority who would be the proper person to resolve
the dispute. In light of that, we pass the following order.
4. The impugned order dated 25.11.2021 is set aside. The
revenue authorities shall decide the representation of the petitioner
on its own merits and after issuing notice to all interested parties.
The writ appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. There shall be no
order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is
closed.
(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.)
04.01.2024
Index : Yes/No
Neutral Citation : Yes/No
sra
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
(sra) To
1. The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Cuddalore District, Tamilnadu.
2. The Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai, Tamilnadu.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the RDO, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District, Tamilnadu.
04.01.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!