Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2151 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2024
SA(MD).No.2062 of 2003
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 01.02.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
SA(MD).No.2062 of 2003 and
CMP.No.18892 of 2003
Bright : Appellant
-vs-
1. Vasanthakumar
2.P.K.Preethi
3.V.K.Pratheep
4.V.K.Ashok
5.V.Jayalakshmi
6.Rajaiah
7.Jayaprakash
8.Jain
9.Sukumaran Nair
10.Srinivasa Panicker
11.Sekara Panicker
12.Arjuna Panicker
13.Rasaiyan
14.Rajamma
15.Esther
16.Nagappan Asan
17.Gopi
18.Lilli
19.Cashewnut factory
rep. by its Manager K.C.Soman
20.South Indian Thirusabai
Nagercoil, Kanniyakumari District.
21.Surendran Nair
1
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
SA(MD).No.2062 of 2003
22.Nalini
23.Suseela Devi
24.Kuttappan
25.Sathiyaseelan : Respondents
PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 C.P.C against
the Judgment and decree, dated 26.11.2002 made in A.S.No.78 of 1997 on
the file of the Subordinate Judge, Kuzhithurai reversing the Judgment and
decree of the Additional District Munsif Kuzhithurai, dated 17.03.1997
made in O.S.No.526 of 1977.
For Appellant : No appearance
For respondent : No appearance
JUDGMENT
This matter earlier came up for consideration on 21.09.2023. On
that date the learned counsel for the appellant reported that in spite of
addressing the letter to the appellant no instructions received by him.
Again the matter was listed on 31.01.2024, but, there was no
representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter was directed to be
listed today under the caption for dismissal. In spite of the matter listed
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
today, under the caption for dismissal there is no representation for the
appellant. Further, from the perusal of materials on records it is noticed
that the respondents 11, 17, 19 to 24 were not served though the Second
Appeal is of the year 2003. Further, the respondents stated that the
respondents 9, 12, 13 and 15 are no more. But, no steps have been taken
so far to bring on record the Legal representatives of the deceased
respondents. As the Second Appeal is of the year 2003 more than two
decades old, this Court is not inclined to show any indulgence for
adjourning the matter.
2. In the circumstances, this Court is left with no other option
except to dismiss this appeal for non prosecution. Accordingly, the Second
Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the
connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
01.02.2024
Internet : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
trp
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
To
1. The Subordinate Judge, Kuzhithurai.
2. The Additional District Munsif Kuzhithurai,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR. J.
trp
SA(MD).No.2062 of 2003 and
01.02.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!