Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

C.Vijayabalan vs The Commissioner
2024 Latest Caselaw 15242 Mad

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15242 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2024

Madras High Court

C.Vijayabalan vs The Commissioner on 7 August, 2024

Author: J.Nisha Banu

Bench: J.Nisha Banu

                                                                                      W.A.No.3403 of 2023


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   Reserved On : 15.07.2024
                                              Pronounced On : 07.08.2024
                                                          CORAM
                                    THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
                                                            AND
                                    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL
                                                    W.A.No.3403 of 2023


                C.Vijayabalan                                       ... Appellant
                                                                    /Respondent No.2

                                                           Versus

                1.The Commissioner
                  Tiruvannamalai Municipality
                  Tiruvannamalai                                    ..1st respondent/petitioner

                2.The Presiding Officer
                  The Principal Labour Court
                  Vellore                                           ...2nd respondents/1st respondent.



                PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, against the

                order passed in W.P.No.7922 of 2016 dated 20.07.2023.

                                   For Appellant       : M/s. Balan Haridas

                                   For Respondent      : Mr.P.Srinivas for R1



                                                      JUDGMENT

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Per J.NISHA BANU, J.

This writ appeal is filed as against the order passed by the learned Single

Judge dated 20.07.2023 passed in W.P.No.7922 of 2016, wherein, it was

observed that the petitioner Municipality appointed the employee/second

respondent (appellant herein) in the regular vacancy and placed him in time

scale of pay; having regard to the subsequent employment, the award passed in

I.D.No.72 of 2014 dated 18.11.2014 passed by the Presiding Officer, Vellore,

u/s.2A(2) of the I.D.Act was set aside.

2. The main issue raised by the appellant-employee herein is that the

relief of regularization granted by the Labour Court ought not to have been

interfered with by the learned Single Judge.

3. The learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the Labour

court after considering Ex.P.1 to P.9, which are receipts for remitting the

amount collected by him came to conclusion that the appellant was working

prior to 01.10.1996 and after considering the evidence of M.W.1, the Labour

court found that 30 employees employed along with the appellant were

regularized. Since the appellant satisfies educational qualification and other

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

eligibility condition and when the co-employees were regularized, he would

also have got to be regularized.

4. The learned counsel for the appellant further brought to the attention of

this court the findings of the Labour court that non-inclusion of the name of the

appellant is the fault of the Management and the Management has not included

his name since he was litigating. The learned counsel also submitted that the

learned Judge erred in holding that the Labour Court has no power to extend the

benefit of G.O.Ms.No.125, dated 27.05.1999. The learned counsel in support of

his submissions relied on the following decisions:-

1. 1950 SCC 470 [Bharat Bank Ltd., Vs. Employees]

2. 2009 SCC Online Mad 455 [K.Ramaswamy Vs. Warwick Estate and

others]

3. 2014 SCC Online Mad 6797 [Amanullah Vs. Chennai Port Trust and

another]

4. 2014 (7) SCC 190 [Hari Nandan Prasad and another Vs. Food

Corporation of India]

5. Order in W.P.No.1561 of 2020 dated 6.12.2021 [Puthiya Jananayaka

Thozhilalar Munani Vs. Power Soap and Abirami Soap works]

6. 1998 (2) L.W.534 [N.Mamundiraj Vs.BHEL]

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

7. 2023 SCC Online SC 771 [Om Prakash Banerjee Vs. State of West

Bengal and others]

5. Per contra, Mr.P.Srinivas, learned counsel appearing for the 1st

respondent-Municipality would submit that the claim for regularization and

permanent status has rightly been rejected by the learned Single Judge since the

appellant has not been appointed in a permanent vacancy.

6. Heard both sides and perused the records carefully.

7. In the present case, the Labour court allowed the appellant's I.D and

passed the award with a direction to the Municipality that the

appellant/employee be made permanent from the day on which the other

workers employed with him were made permanent as per G.O.No.125 dated

27.05.1999 and be provided with time scale of pay with back wages and also all

the benefits be given to the employee. The Labour court pointed out that when

the other employees were taken into service in the year 1999 as others under

G.O.dated 27.05.1999, the petitioner could have also represented; since he was

continuing the case before the High Court; the nature of government orders

could not have been known to the workers; However, the omission of the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

employee from being recommended to be made permanent under G.O.No.125

dated 27.05.1999 and provide scale of pay is a mistake; but as like other

workers were made permanent on that day and given time scale of pay along

with back wages and these benefits ought to have been given to the petitioner

too and therefore it is proper that the petitioner is also made permanent as per

the orders in the G.O.dated 27.5.1999 and fix scale of pay from that day and

paid back wages and other benefits is proper.

8. Pursuant to the above award in I.D., and order passed in Computation

Petition No.6 of 2015, the appellant was appointed in the regular vacancy and

he was placed in the time scale of pay. Therefore, when the appellant was

appointed in the time scale of pay by the Municipality, in the same manner and

position as that of similarly placed employees, the appellant has to be given

regularization along with back wages and made permanent. In our considered

opinion, the benefit of the regularization given in G.O.Ms.No.125 dated

27.05.1999 cannot be ignored for the appellant alone when the same has been

extended to similarly placed employees.

9. Therefore, we do not agree with the view taken in the impugned order

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

of the learned Single Judge. The appellant is entitled to receive back wages and

benefits from 1991. Accordingly, the writ appeal is allowed. The impugned

order dated 20.07.2023 is set aside. The award of the Labour court is restored in

respect of backwages and regularization. No costs.

                                                             (J.N.B, J.)     (P.D.B, J.)

                                                                     07 .08.2024

                Index : Yes /No
                Speaking order : Yes /No
                Neutral Citation Case : Yes /No
                nvsri


                To

                1.The Commissioner
                  Tiruvannamalai Municipality
                  Tiruvannamalai

                2.The Presiding Officer
                  The Principal Labour Court
                  Vellore




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis



                                  J. NISHA BANU, J.
                                               and
                                    P.DHANABAL,J.



                                                  nvsri




                                        Judgment in





                                            07.08.2024




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter