Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

A.Vigneshwaran vs The State Of Tamil Nadu
2023 Latest Caselaw 11676 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11676 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 September, 2023

Madras High Court
A.Vigneshwaran vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 1 September, 2023
                                                                              W.P.No.25735 of 2023


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED: 01.09.2023

                                                    CORAM:

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

                                            W.P.No.25735 of 2023 &
                                             WMP.No.25161 of 2023



                     A.Vigneshwaran                                          ... Petitioner


                                                        Vs


                     1. The State of Tamil Nadu,
                        Represented by its Principal Secretary,
                        Health and Family Department,
                        Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

                     2. The Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine,
                        Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 086.

                     3. The Director of Medical and Rural Health Services,
                        Anna Salai, Chennai.

                     4. Directorate of Medical Education,
                        Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

                     5. Government Kilpauk Medical College,
                        Represented by its Dean,
                        Poonamallee High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

                     1/9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  W.P.No.25735 of 2023



                     6. Government Hospital Panruti,
                        Representation by its Chief Medical Officer,
                        Cuddalore – 607 106.                                    ... Respondents



                     Prayer:- Writ Petition is filed, under the Article 226 of Constitution of
                     India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities
                     to forthwith permit the petitioner to relieve from service by issuing
                     reliving order and return all original certificates of the petitioner that
                     were submitted by him at the time of his admission to Post Graduate
                     Degree Course within a time period stipulated by this Court.


                                  For petitioner      : Mr.C.Vidhusan

                                  For Respondents     : Mr.S.Arumugam
                                                        Government Advocate


                                                     ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondent authorities

to forthwith permit the petitioner to relieve from service by issuing

reliving order and return all original certificates of the petitioner that

were submitted by him at the time of his admission to Post Graduate

Degree Course within a time period stipulated by this Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.25735 of 2023

2. It is the case of the writ petitioner that he joined the Post

Graduation Degree Course in Government College in Tamil Nadu in

May, 2021 and at the time of admission, he executed a bond with an

undertaking to serve the Government of Tamil Nadu for a period of two

years and the original certificates of the petitioner were also submitted to

the respondent authorities. Thereafter, the petitioner completed his Post

Graduation Degree Course in May, 2021. As per the bond, the petitioner

is required to work for two years. However, the petitioner was given

posting orders only on 10.07.2022. The petitioner joined duty in the

sixth respondent hospital through counselling from August 2022, and he

have been rendering his service continuously till date.

3. It is the grievance of the petitioner that, though the bond period

of two years got completed in the month of May, 2023, i.e., two years

from the date of completion of Post Graduate Course and the bond has

become infructuous, the petitioner has not been relieved from his duties

and his original certificates have not been returned to him. Despite the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.25735 of 2023

requests made by the petitioner before the respondent authorities on

several occasions, nothing fruitful has happened. Hence, the present

Writ Petition.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that

the writ petitioner has completed his Post Graduate Degree Course in the

month of May, 2021. However, immediately after completion of his

course, he has not been given appointment and the posting orders have

been issued only 10.07.2022. Hence, it is the contention of the learned

counsel for the petitioner that, at the most, the petitioner can be

compelled to work only till the expiry of the bond period and once the

bond period is over, the petitioner cannot be forced to continue to work

with the respondents and the petitioner ought to have been relieved from

his duties and the petitioner is also entitled for return of his original

certificates. In support of his arguments, the learned counsel also relied

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.25735 of 2023

upon a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in State of Tamil

Nadu through its Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare

and another v. P.S.Sairam and others reported in 2020 SCC Online Mad

2742, wherein the Division Bench of this Court in Para No.102, has held

as follows :

“102. Our conclusions, therefore, are : ....

vi. The period of applicability of the conditions under

the bond will be co-terminus with the period of two years

from the date a candidate successfully passes out the course,

as explained above, and would not continue beyond the

same.

vii. The candidates who have not been offered

appointment within the period of two years would be entitled

to release of his certificates accordingly.”

6. The above dictum makes it clear that the period of applicability

of the conditions under the bond will be co-terminus with the period of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.25735 of 2023

two years from the date a candidate successfully passes out the course

and would not continue beyond the same. Similarly, the Division Bench,

in Para No.102 of the same judgment, has held that appointment should

be given within a period of two years and even if any occupation is taken

by the student in the meantime, the student is liable to perform for the

period for which he have filled up the bond. The above dictum makes it

clear that, if any employment or posting is to be issued by the

respondents, it ought to have been issued within a period of two years

after the completion of the course. Since the bond will be co-terminus

with the period of two years from the date a candidate successfully

passes out the course, the respondents ought to have given posting orders

immediately after the petitioner completed his course. Whereas, in the

case on hand, the posting orders have been issued much later, i.e., after a

lapse of 14 months from the date of completion of course by the

petitioner. Therefore, this Court is of the view that, at the most, the

petitioner can be forced to work only till the expiry of bond period and

not beyond that. In such view of the matter, the petitioner is to be

relieved from his duties by the respondent authorities.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.25735 of 2023

7. The learned Government Advocate fairly submitted that the

petitioner will be relieved from his duties and his original certificates

will be returned to him and necessary orders in this regard will be passed

by the respondent authorities within a period of four weeks.

8. Accordingly, the respondent authorities are directed to relieve

the petitioner from his duties and return all the original certificates to the

petitioner, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a

copy of this order.

9. With the above direction, this Writ petitions is disposed of.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

01.09.2023

Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No vrc

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.25735 of 2023

To,

1. The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

2. The Directorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 086.

3. The Director of Medical and Rural Health Services, Anna Salai, Chennai.

4. Directorate of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

5. Government Kilpauk Medical College, Represented by its Dean, Poonamallee High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

6. Government Hospital Panruti, Representation by its Chief Medical Officer, Cuddalore – 607 106.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.25735 of 2023

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

vrc

WP.No.25735 of 2023

01.09.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter