Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14228 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 November, 2023
C.M.A(MD)No.1089 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 07.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
C.M.A(MD)No.1089 of 2023
and
C.M.P(MD)No.14960 of 2023
S.Rajkumar ...Appellant
.vs.
G.S.Sri Vidhyavathy ...Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of the
Family Courts Act, 1984 to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated
made in I.A.No.1893 of 2022 in H.M.O.P.No.714 of 2019, on the file of
the Family Court, Madurai.
For Appellant :Mr.D.Devi Saravana Priya
For Respondent :Mr.J.Karmegakannan
JUDGMENT
************
[Judgment of the Court was made by RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN.,J.]
Mr.J.Karmegakannan, learned counsel takes notice for the
respondent / wife.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A(MD)No.1089 of 2023
2. After hearing both parties, we find that the respondent / wife has
initially filed H.M.O.P.No.88 of 2018 for restitution of conjugal rights,
wherein, the appellant / husband has filed a memo stating that he is
willing to live with the respondent, however, the respondent / wife has
also withdrew the said application on 31.01.2019. Thereafter, the
respondent / wife filed another H.M.O.P.No.714 of 2019 before the
Family Court, Madurai for divorce on the ground of cruelty. Pending the
said HMOP, the appellant / husband filed an application in I.A.No.742 of
2022 for custody of the child and the same was allowed to the limited
extent. In the meanwhile, respondent / wife filed an application in
I.A.No.1893 of 2022 seeking interim maintenance. After contest, the
Family Judge, Madurai has granted an interim maintenance of Rs.3,000/-
to the wife and Rs.3,000/- to the minor son. Aggrieved against the said
order, the husband has filed the present appeal on the ground that at the
time, he was working as Software Engineer, however, after Covid-19 he
is at home and hence, the maintenance amount awarded by the Family
Court is exorbitant.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent / wife
submitted that the respondent is working from home.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A(MD)No.1089 of 2023
4. After perusing the discussions made by the learned Family
Judge, Madurai and also taking into consideration the various pleadings
contended and quantum of maintenance being awarded at Rs.3,000/- for
wife and Rs.3,000/- for minor son, we do not find any error that the said
amount is exorbitant as projected by the learned counsel for the
appellant. The quantum of maintenance granted by the Family Judge
appears to be just and fair and does not require any interference.
5. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. No
costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[T.K.R.,J.] [P.B.B.,J.]
07.11.2023
Index:Yes/No
Internet:Yes/No
NCC:Yes/No
am
To
The Family Court,
Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A(MD)No.1089 of 2023
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J.
AND P.B.BALAJI,J.
am
JUDGMENT MADE IN C.M.A(MD)No.1089 of 2023
07.11.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!