Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14145 Mad
Judgement Date : 1 November, 2023
C.R.P.(MD)No.2780 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 01.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
C.R.P.(MD)No.2780 of 2023
and
C.M.P.(MD)No.14522 of 2023
Latharani Elizabeth ... Petitioner/
Respondent/
Defendant
Vs.
Dharmalingam ... Respondent/
Petitioner/
Plaintiff
Prayer : This Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Civil
Procedure Code, to set aside the fair and decreetal order made in E.P.No.
241 of 2022 in O.S.No.599 of 2017 on the file of the Principal
Subordinate Judge, Dindigul dated 14.08.2023.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Venkatesh
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.R.P.(MD)No.2780 of 2023
ORDER
The Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order passed in
E.P.No.241 of 2022 in O.S.No.599 of 2017 dated 14.08.2023 on the file of
the Principal Subordinate Court, Dindigul, ordering delivery.
2. It is seen from the records that the respondent has filed a suit in
O.S.No.599 of 2017 for recovery of possession and after trial, the suit was
decreed on 01.06.2022 and that thereafter, the decree holder has filed an
execution petition in E.P.No.241 of 2022 seeking delivery of possession.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would
submit that earlier to the present suit, the revision petitioner has filed a suit
in O.S.No.35 of 2017 claiming permanent injunction not to evict him
except under due process of law and that during the pendency of the above
suit, the respondent has filed a counter claim for recovery of rent, but the
same was rejected.
4. A cursory perusal of the judgment passed in O.S.No.35 of 2017
would show that the learned trial Judge has observed that though the
defendants therein have filed their counter claim, the same was taken only
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD)No.2780 of 2023
as written statement and after trial, decreed the suit granting permanent
injunction in favour of the revision petitioner.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would
submit that the revision petitioner challenging the judgment and decree
passed in O.S.No.599 of 2017 has preferred an appeal along with an
application to condone the delay in filing the same and the same is
pending.
6. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned
counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would submit that the Court
has taken the possession of the property yesterday (31.10.2023).
7. Considering the above, nothing survives for further adjudication.
Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.
01.11.2023 NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No csm
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.R.P.(MD)No.2780 of 2023
K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.
csm
To
1. The Principal Subordinate Court, Dindigul.
2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Order made in C.R.P.(MD)No.2780 of 2023 and C.M.P.(MD)No.14522 of 2023
Dated : 01.11.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!