Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3632 Mad
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2023
C.M.P. (MD)No.11027 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 31.03.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.M.P.(MD)No.11027 of 2019
and
C.M.A.(MD) No.SR69341 of 2019
The Managing Director,
The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
Bye Pass Road, Madurai. ...Petitioner/Appellant
Vs.
1.K.Sasikumar
2.Minor S.Ajeikumar
3.Minor S.Aarthi
4.M.Ravindran
5.R.Maruthayi ...Respondents/Respondents
PRAYER in C.M.P.(MD)No.11027 of 2019: This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is
filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act to condone the delay of 172
days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the judgment and decree
dated 30.11.2018 passed in M.C.O.P.No.105 of 2016 on the file of the Motor
Accident Claims Tribunal (Additional District Court), Virudhunagar.
PRAYER in C.M.A.(MD)No.SR69341 of 2019: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal
is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to set aside the
judgment and decree in M.C.O.P.No.105 of 2016 dated 30.11.2018 on the file of
the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Additional District Court), Virudhunagar.
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.P. (MD)No.11027 of 2019
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sudalayandi
For R1 to R3 : Mr.P.Samuel Gunasingh
ORDER
This application has been filed to condone the delay of 172 days in filing
the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the judgment and decree, dated 30.11.2018
passed in M.C.O.P.No.105 of 2016 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims
Tribunal (Additional District Court), Virudhunagar.
2.The reasons stated in the application are that the award was passed on
30.11.2018 and the application for certified copy was made on 03.12.2018 by the
learned counsel. The certified copy of the decree and judgment was received on
11.01.2019. Thereafter, papers were placed before the Finance Committee for
getting approval to file an appeal against the said judgment and decree. Hence,
the delay was occurred.
3.On perusal of the entire affidavit, except these two reasons, no other
sufficient reasons whatsoever have been given by the petitioner. Therefore, if the
delay that was occurred because of such casual manner is condoned, the same will
encourage the Officials to be very careless in prosecuting the matter before the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P. (MD)No.11027 of 2019
Court of law. What is fitted against the common man is equally fitted against the
Government undertakings. Though the delay appears to be 172 days, the same
cannot be condoned mechanically without any proper reasons.
4. Even otherwise, the appeal has been filed challenging the negligence. On
perusal of the award, it is clear that the trial Court on appreciation of entire oral
and documentary evidence adduced by the claimants found that the negligence is
only on the part of the driver of the bus. No oral and documentary evidence had
been adduced by the respondent to prove the alleged negligence.
5.For the reasons stated above, this Court does not find any merit in this
petition and accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.
Consequently, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is also rejected at the SR stage
itself. No costs.
31.03.2023 Index : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No ta
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P. (MD)No.11027 of 2019
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
ta
To
1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District Court, Virudhunagar.
2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
C.M.P.(MD)No.11027 of 2019 and C.M.A.(MD) No.SR69341 of 2019
31.03.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!