Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2967 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 March, 2023
W.P.No.6899 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.03.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
W.P.No.6899 of 2023
A.Nataraj ...Petitioner
Vs
The Sub-Registrar,
Joint No.II Sub Registrar Office,
Erode District. ...Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records
relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent dated
06.02.2023 made in refusal check slip reference No.Ref.No.RFL/Joint
No.1, Sub Registrar, Erode/12/2023 refusing to register the order in
O.S.NO.540 of 2020 dated 18.12.2020 passed by the learned I Additional
Subordinate Judge, Erode and to quash the same and consequently direct
the respondent to register the said order and to return the documents on
its registration forthwith.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vignesh
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.6899 of 2023
for Mr.C.S.Saravanan
For Respondent : Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan,
Special Government Pleader
ORDER
With the consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for
final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. When the petitioner herein sought for registration of a decree
passed in O.S.No.540 of 2020, dated 18.12.2020, on the file of the
learned I Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode, the registration was
refused through the impugned check slip, by placing reliance on Section
25 of the Registration Act [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'], by stating
that such a document ought to have been presented before four months
from the decree.
3. The issue as to whether the limitation provided under Section 25
of the Act can be applied to a Civil Court decree has come up for
consideration in a batch of writ petitions in the case of Sathiyamoorthy
Vs. The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Pochampalli, Krishnagiri
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.6899 of 2023
District passed in W.P.No.33616 of 2020, etc., whereby it was held that
the limitation under Section 25 of the Act will not be applicable to Court
decrees/judgments/orders, presented for registration.
4. In view of the law laid down by this Court in Sathiyamoorthy's
case (supra), the reason assigned by the respondent for refusing the
registration cannot be sustained.
5. In the light of the above findings, the impugned order dated
06.02.2023 is quashed. Consequently, there shall be a direction to the
respondent herein to accept the decree in O.S.No.540 of 2020 on the file
of the learned I Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode and register and
return the same forthwith, if it is otherwise in order, within a period of
two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly,
the writ petition stands allowed. No costs.
21.03.2023 Index:Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order hvk
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.6899 of 2023
M.S.RAMESH,J.
hvk To
The Sub-Registrar, Joint No.II Sub Registrar Office, Erode District.
W.P.No.6899 of 2023
21.03.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!