Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

A.Jeevandradoss vs Sri Parswantha Digambar Jain ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 2036 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2036 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 March, 2023

Madras High Court
A.Jeevandradoss vs Sri Parswantha Digambar Jain ... on 8 March, 2023
                                                                                        W.A.No.162 of 2023

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 08.03.2023

                                                      CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
                                                   AND
                                  THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI

                                                W.A.No.162 of 2023
                                                       and
                                               C.M.P.No.1545 of 2023

            A.Jeevandradoss                                                         .. Appellant

                                                        -vs-
            1. Sri Parswantha Digambar Jain Bhawan Management Trust
               Represented by its President,
               Mr.S.Srenikaraj,
               S/o. Sundarakumar,
               No.22, Subramaniar Koil Street,
               Tindivanam-604 001.

            2. The District Registrar (Admin)
               Office of District Registrar,
               Tindivanam.

            3. The Joint Sub Registrar No.1,
               Officer of Joint Sub Registrar No.1
               Tindivanam.                                                          .. Respondents


                        Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, to set aside the order

            dated 28.03.2022 made in W.P.No.6655 of 2022.



            1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                       W.A.No.162 of 2023

                                    For Appellant        : Mr.P.Paramasiva Doss
                                    For Respondents      : Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar (R1)
                                                           Mrs.Sangamithirai (R2 & R3)
                                                           Special Government Pleader
                                                           ***

                                                      JUDGMENT

This Writ Appeal has been preferred by the Appellant challenging the order dated

28.03.2022 made in W.P.No.6655 of 2022.

2. The Appellant is the 3rd Respondent in the Writ Petition. When the Writ

Petitioner/1st Respondent presented the Supplement Deed and Lease Deed, before the

1st Respondent, for registration, the 2nd Respondent vide his proceedings in

Na.Ka.No.2811/2020 dated 29.11.2021 directed the Writ Petitioner/1st Respondent to

approach the Civil Court and obtain appropriate orders and that only thereafter, the

Deeds will be entertained for registration. Questioning the said order, the Writ

Petitioner/1st Respondent filed a Writ Petition in W.P.No.6655 of 2022. The learned

Single Judge vide order dated 28.03.2022, directed the Writ Petitioner to present the

Supplementary Deed and Lease Deed before the 2nd Respondent, within a period of

two weeks and on receipt of the same, the official Respondents were directed to process

the deeds in terms of the Registration Act and Stamp Act and Rules, after providing an

opportunity of hearing to the Appellant and to the aggrieved parties, if any, within a

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.162 of 2023

period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order. Being

aggrieved, the present Writ Appeal has been filed by the Appellant.

3. The learned counsel for the Appellant submitted that the learned Single Judge

has disposed of the Writ Petition without giving notice to the Appellant herein, who is

the 3rd Respondent in the Writ Petition. He further submitted that out of 11 trustees,

one trustee died due to Covid-19. It is his further contention that as per the Trust Deed,

the lease period could only be for 15 years and now, they are trying to extend the same

beyond the said period. He drew the attention of this Court to the communication of

the Trust dated 17.02.2021, in which, it is stated that the Appellant/3rd Respondent was

illegally removed from the Trust. He further submitted that no procedure has been

contemplated under Clause 19 of the Trust Deed dated 18.06.2012 for removal of

Trustees, except on certain conditions. For the sake of convenience, Clause 19 of the

Trust Deed is extracted below.

"19. Whenever any Trustee become insolvent or insane or act against the principles stated in clause 10 (c) or is convicted of criminal offence involving moral turpitude or desires to be discharged from or refuses or become unfit or incapable of acting, then and in every case, the surviving or the continuing Trustees for the time being shall be entitled to appoint a Trustee in the place of Such Trustee subject to clause 10 (c) above, who shall hold office of trustee till the normal period of the original trustee."

4.The learned counsel appearing for the 1st Respondent submitted that the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.162 of 2023

Appellant has already been removed from the Trust and therefore his position has not

been questioned.

5. In reply, Mr.P.Paramasiva Doss, learned counsel appearing for the Appellant

submitted that except by way of certain conditions which are prescribed under Clause

19 of the Trust Deed, no Trustee could be removed.

6. Mrs.Sangamithirai, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the

Respondents 2 and 3 submitted that, no documents have been produced before the 2nd

Respondent for registration and unless the same are produced along with the order of

the Court, it would be very difficult for them to register the Supplement deed and the

Lease deed. She further submitted that if any direction is given, the Government is

willing to act as per Rules.

7. Heard both sides. Perused the records.

8. We are not inclined to go into the question as to whether the removal of the

trustee/Appellant herein is in contravention of Clause 19 of the Trust Deed or not. The

learned Single Judge directed the Writ Petitioner to present the Supplementary Deed

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.162 of 2023

and the Lease Deed before the 3rd Respondent herein and on receipt of the same, the

official Respondents were directed to process the deeds in terms of the Registration Act

and Stamp Act and Rules, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner

and to the aggrieved parties. Since, the Appellant herein is an aggrieved person, he

can very well put forth his objections before the authority concerned, who, in turn, will

consider the same and thereafter render a decision.

9. Finding no merits in this Writ Appeal, the same stands dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

                                                                      [S.V.N., J.,]     [R.K.M., J]
                                                                               08.03.2023
            Index: Yes / No
            Internet: Yes / No
            arr





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              W.A.No.162 of 2023

                                                                      S. VAIDYANATHAN,J.,
                                                                                     and
                                                                          R.KALAIMATHI.,J

                                                                                            arr

            To

1. Sri Parswantha Digambar Jain Bhawan Management Trust Represented by its President, Mr.S.Srenikaraj, S/o. Sundarakumar, No.22, Subramaniar Koil Street, Tindivanam-604 001.

2. The District Registrar (Admin) Office of District Registrar, Tindivanam.

3. The Joint Sub Registrar No.1, Officer of Joint Sub Registrar No.1 Tindivanam.

W.A.No.162 of 2023

08.03.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter