Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1990 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 March, 2023
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.310 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Date : 07.03.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.310 of 2017
A.Vasantha Arumugam ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The State Rep. by
The Inspector of Police,
District Crime Branch,
Dindigul,
Dindigul District.
(Crime No.63 of 2010)
2.Jeyalakshmi @ Mathiarasi
3.Krishnan ... Respondents
PRAYER : This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Section
397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., revising the order of acquittal passed by means of
the judgment of the learned Additional District Judge, Dindigul, Dindigul
District, dated 19.01.2017 made in C.A.No.16 of 2015 confirming the
judgment of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul, Dindigul
District, dated 10.06.2014 made in C.C.No.287 of 2011 of acquitting the
respondents 2 and 3 who are the accused in Crime No.63 of 2010 on the
file of the District Crime Branch, Dindigul, Dindigul District for the
offences under Sections 120(b), 406, 463, 472 and 420 of IPC forth with.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.310 of 2017
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Palani Velayutham
For R1 : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar
Additional Public Prosecutor
For R2 & R3 : Mr.A.Arul Jenifer
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Case is filed to set aside the order of
acquittal passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Dindigul,
Dindigul District, dated 19.01.2017 made in C.A.No.16 of 2015,
confirming the judgment of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II,
Dindigul, Dindigul District, dated 10.06.2014 made in C.C.No.287 of
2011 acquitting the respondents 2 and 3, who are the accused in Crime
No.63 of 2010 on the file of the District Crime Branch, Dindigul,
Dindigul District for the offences under Sections 120(b), 406, 463, 472
and 420 of IPC forth with.
2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and
perused the materials available on records.
3. It is seen from the records that the present revision case
has been filed as against the order of acquittal passed by the appellate
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.310 of 2017
Court. As per the decision of the Full Court judgment of this Court
reported in 2020 (4) CTC 1 (K.Rajalingam Vs. R.Sunganthalakshmi),
the appeal as against the acquittal lies before this Court. Hence, the
petitioner is at liberty to file an appeal as against the order of acquittal
before this Court in accordance with law.
4. With the above liberty, this Criminal Revision Case is
dismissed.
07.03.2023
NCC : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Index : Yes/No cp
To
1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul, Dindigul District.
2.The Additional District Judge, Dindigul, Dindigul District.
3.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul, Dindigul District.
4.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.310 of 2017
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN , J., cp
5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.310 of 2017
07.03.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!