Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Karthikeyan vs The Managing Director
2023 Latest Caselaw 1944 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1944 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 March, 2023

Madras High Court
Karthikeyan vs The Managing Director on 7 March, 2023
                                                                                   CMA.No.1376 of 2020

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                      DATED :07.03.2023

                                                          CORAM :

                                      THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA

                                        Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.1376 of 2020

                     Karthikeyan                                       ... Appellant/Claimant

                                                          -Vs-

                     The Managing Director,
                     Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd.,
                     No.37, Mettupalayam Salai, Coimbatore.                        … Respondent

                     Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the
                     Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree dated
                     03.02.2020 in MCOP.No.102 of 2015 on the file of the Motor Accident
                     Claims Tribunal/Subordinate Judge Court, Tiruchengode.
                                     For Appellant          : Mr.T.S.Arthanareeswaran
                                     For Respondent         : Mr.M.Murali Vinodh


                                                        JUDGMENT

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the judgment and

decree dated 03.02.2020 made in MCOP No.102 of 2015 on the file of

the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal/Subordinate Judge Court,

Tiruchengode.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CMA.No.1376 of 2020

2. The claimant has filed this appeal seeking enhancement of

compensation.

3. It is the case of the appellant/claimant that, on 25.02.2015, when

he was riding his two wheeler at Tiruchengode to Namakkal Main Road,

Near Maramangalam Bus Stop, a bus belonging to the Transport

Corporation came in the opposite direction in a rash and negligent

manner, hit his two-wheeler, due to which, he fell down and sustained

grievous injuries. The appellant/claimant was admitted in Krishna

Hospital, as in-patient and took treatment for the injuries sustained by

him in the accident. The appellant/claimant, therefore, filed the claim

petition before the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal/Subordinate

Judge, Court, Tiruchengode, claiming a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- as

compensation for the injuries sustained by him in the motor accident.

4. The respondent/Transport Corporation remained ex-parte before

the Court below.

5. The appellant/claimant examined himself as P.W.1 and one

Dr.Saravanan as P.W.2 and marked Exs.P1 to P9 in support of his case. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CMA.No.1376 of 2020

The respondent/Transport Corporation remained ex-parte, and so no oral

or documentary evidence was filed on its side.

6. The Tribunal, on the basis of the pleadings and on an assessment

of the entire evidence on record, awarded a sum of Rs.3,79,300/- as

compensation along with 7.5% interest. Not satisfied with the

compensation awarded by the Tribunal, the claimant/appellant has filed

this appeal seeking enhancement of compensation.

7. It is seen that the Tribunal, on the basis of Ex.P8, assessed the

disability at 10% and awarded a sum of Rs.30,000/- by adopting the unit

method. Under the other heads, the Tribunal awarded a sum of

Rs.3,49,300/- and in toto awarded Rs.3,79,300/- as compensation.

8. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the

assessment of disability at 10% by the Medical Board under Ex.P8 was

disproportionate to the nature of the injuries sustained by the claimant.

The learned counsel submits that skin grafting was done in the left arm

and forearm and external fixation was done in the humerus for the

fracture injury and hence the assessment of disability at 10% was https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CMA.No.1376 of 2020

erroneous. The learned counsel would further submit that the

appellant/claimant was admitted in the hospital from 25.02.2015 to

09.04.2015 and hence the award of the Tribunal under various heads like

pain and suffering, extra nutrition etc., was grossly inadequate.

9. The learned counsel for the respondent, on the other hand,

submits that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is fair and

reasonable and hence it does not call for any interference by this Court.

10. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and

have perused the records.

11. I find that the assessment of disability at 10% as pointed out by

the learned counsel for the appellant seems to be disproportionate to the

nature of injuries sustained by the appellant. The appellant had shaft

fracture in left humerus with brachial artery injury, extensive degloving

injury in left arm and forearm and skin grafting was done in his left arm

and forearm because of the deep cut injury. Considering the nature of

injuries suffered by the appellant and also considering the fact that there

is disfigurement, the disability is assessed at 20%. As the accident https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CMA.No.1376 of 2020

occurred in the year 2015, following the judgment of this Court in the

case of The Manager Vs. Rajan in C.M.A.No.1545 of 2020 dated

07.12.2020 an amount of Rs.5,000/- is fixed for per percentage of

disability, instead of Rs.3,000/- per percentage of disability fixed by the

Tribunal.

12. Considering the long period of treatment, I am of the view that

the compensation of Rs.15,000/- towards pain and suffering needs to be

enhanced and the same is enhanced to Rs.50,000/-. The

appellant/claimant is further entitled to Rs.20,000/- towards extra

nourishment and Rs.10,000/- towards attender charges. The award under

the heads of transportation charges, medical bills and the loss of income

is confirmed.

13. In the light of the said discussions, I deem it fit to modify the

award of the Tribunal as follows:

                       S.No.             Particulars             Award of              Enhanced
                                                                 Tribunal               amount
                           1.      Permanent Disability        Rs.     30,000/- Rs.       1,00,000/-   Enhanced
                           2.      Medical Bills               Rs.    2,65,300/- Rs.      2,65,300/- Confirmed
                           3.      Pain and Suffering          Rs.     15,000/- Rs.         50,000/-   Enhanced
                           4.      Extra Nourishment           Rs.      10,000- Rs.         20,000/-   Enhanced
                           5.      Attender charges            Rs.      5,000/- Rs.         10,000/-   Enhanced


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

                                                                                         CMA.No.1376 of 2020


                       S.No.             Particulars          Award of             Enhanced
                                                              Tribunal              amount
                           6.      Transportation Charges   Rs.    30,000/- Rs.         30,000/- Confirmed
                           7.      Loss of Income           Rs.    24,000/- Rs.         24,000/- Confirmed
                                                            Rs.   3,79,300/- Rs.      4,99,300/-

14. Accordingly, the amount awarded by the Tribunal is enhanced

from Rs.3,79,300/- to Rs.4,99,300/- together with interest at 7.5% per

annum from the date of petition till date of deposit as compensation.

15. The respondent/Transport Corporation is directed to deposit

the entire amount i.e., Rs.4,99,300/- together with interest at 7.5% per

annum from the date of petition till date of deposit and costs to the credit

of MCOP.No.102 of 2015 on the file of the Motor Vehicle Accident

Claims Tribunal/ Subordinate Judge Court, Tiruchengode within a period

of eight(8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

16. The appellant shall be entitled to withdraw the entire amount

on such deposit by the Transport Corporation by making proper

application.

Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CMA.No.1376 of 2020

No costs.

07.03.2023 mp

To The Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal/ Subordinate Judge Court, Tiruchengode.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CMA.No.1376 of 2020

N.MALA, J.

mp

CMA.No.1376 of 2020

07.03.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter