Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6366 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 June, 2023
W.P.No.30063 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.06.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
W.P.No. 30063 of 2019
K.Kuppuraj(Deceased)
2.K.Amaravathy
3.Bismel Rubeena
4.Govindaraj
5.Kalaivani
(P2 to P5 substituted as LR's of deceased
sole petitioner vide order dated 10.11.2022
made in WMP.No.27234/2022 in W.P.No.30063/2019) ... Petitioner
Versus
1.The Chairman
Chennai Port Trust.
2.The Traffic Manager,
Chennai Port Trust.
3.The Senior Deputy Traffix Manager,
Porterage/CHD
Chennai Port Trust.
4.Accounts Officer(Pension)
Chennai Port Trust. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, prays to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire
records pertaining to the order dated 06.10.2018 in A4/0252/2018/T(CHD)
issued by the 3rd respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.30063 of 2019
respondents to include the petitioner's wife's name Mrs.K.Amaravathy in the
petitioner's Pension Payment Order(PPO)book No.12985 as per regulation
No.46(ii)(a) of Chennai Port Trust(Pension) Regulations, 1987.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Rajkumar Pandian
For Respondents : Mrs.Madhuri Donti Reddy
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of
Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records pertaining to the order
dated 06.10.2018 in A4/0252/2018/T(CHD) issued by the 3rd respondent and
quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to include the
petitioner's wife's name (Mrs.K.Amaravathy) in the petitioner's Pension
Payment Order(PPO)book No.12985 as per regulation No.46(ii)(a) of
Chennai Port Trust(Pension) Regulations, 1987.
2. The petitioner died pending the above writ petition and petitioners 2
to 5 being his legal representatives were substituted in his place in and by
order dated 10.11.2022 in W.M.P.No.27234 of 2022. According to the
petitioner, the 2nd petitioner is the legally wedded wife of the petitioner and
another lady Amaravathi sought for her name to be included as the wife of
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30063 of 2019
the petitioner. In fact, the proceedings were also initiated by the said
Amaravathi claiming to be wife of the petitioner in M.C.No.1027 of 1979.
The said maintenance case was dismissed by order dated 16.04.1980 holding
that the said Amaravathi did not establish that she was the legally wedded
wife and consequently, she was not entitled to claim maintenance from the
petitioner. Despite referring relevant documents and the order passed by the
learned III Metropolitan Magistrate Court, the respondents passed the
impugned order directing the petitioner to furnish a competent Court's Order
after the year 2006 (i.e.,after the date of his retirement) to establish identity
of his wife.
3. The 3rd respondent has filed a counter stating that only because
there was a rival claim, the impugned order was passed. Moreover, the
petitioner himself had submitted a self declaration letter dated 21.06.2006
stating that the terminal benefits would be shared between his two wives.
Therefore, since there was sufficient reason for apprehending the genuineness
of the claim of the petitioner, the respondent had rightly called upon the
petitioner to obtain necessary orders after the year 2006. According to the
respondents, the petitioner was not able to produce any Court order excepting
the order in the maintenance case dated 16.04.1980.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30063 of 2019
4. However, during the course of the arguments, the learned counsel
for the petitioner would submit that a suit was filed in O.S.No.30 of 2020
before the learned District Munsif Court, Thiruvottiyur by the petitioner as
plaintiff therein. The petitioner herein as plaintiff therein sought for a
declaration of relief that the person under the name Amaravathi claiming to
be his wife was not legitimate in claiming to be the wife of the petitioner and
for consequential permanent injunction. The learned District Munsif Court,
Thiruvottiyur, has passed a judgment and decree in O.S.No.30 of 2020 on
30.04.2021.The copy of the judgment and decree are filed by way of an
additional typed set.
5. Considering the above submissions and developments, the
petitioners shall make a fresh representation enclosing the certified copies of
the judgment and decree in O.S.No.30 of 2020 dated 30.04.2021 before the
3rd respondent within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a
copy of this order and on receipt of the same, the 3rd respondent shall pass
final orders on merits and in accordance with law, considering the fresh
representation and enclosures including the certified copies of the judgment
and decree, within six weeks thereafter.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30063 of 2019
6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
16.06.2023
Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes Speaking/non speaking order nr
To
1.The Chairman Chennai Port Trust.
2.The Traffic Manager, Chennai Port Trust.
3.The Senior Deputy Traffix Manager, Porterage/CHD Chennai Port Trust.
4.Accounts Officer(Pension) Chennai Port Trust.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.30063 of 2019
P.B.BALAJI, J., nr
W.P.No. 30063 of 2019
16.06.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!