Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

South Indian Cine Television ... vs The Member Secretary To ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 6068 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6068 Mad
Judgement Date : 13 June, 2023

Madras High Court
South Indian Cine Television ... vs The Member Secretary To ... on 13 June, 2023
                                                                         W.P.No.16976 of 2023

                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                      DATED: 13.6.2023

                                                           CORAM

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
                                                     AND
                                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL

                                                 W.P..No.16976 of 2023

                     South Indian Cine Television Artists and
                     Dubbing Artists Union
                     Rep. by its General Secretary.                ...    Petitioner


                                                Vs.

                     1. The Member Secretary to Government,
                        Housing and Urban Development,
                        Secretariat, Fort St.George,
                        Chennai 600 009.

                     2. The Additional Secretary (Technical)
                        Housing and Urban Development
                        Secretariat, Fort St. George,
                        Chennai 600 009.

                     3. The Commissioner,
                        Greater Chennai Corporation,
                        Rippon Buildings, Chennai 600 003.

                     4. The Executive Engineer,
                        Town Planning Section – Kodambakkam,
                        Zone 10, Greater Chennai Corporation,
                        No.64, N.S.K. Salai, Chennai – 600 026.

                     5. The Member Secretary
                        Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority,
                        Egmore, Chennai 600 008.                ...       Respondents
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     1/4
                                                                                  W.P.No.16976 of 2023

                              Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                     praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to
                     de-seal the premises situate at door No.10/3 Vijayaraghavapuram, 4th Street,
                     Saligramam, Chennai – 600 093 permanently for the purpose of demolition as
                     per the demolition permission granted by the 4th respondent in his proceedings
                     in W.D.C.No.DA/WDCN10/00313/2023 dated 15.5.2023 and for re-construction
                     of new building in the aforesaid premises.

                                      For Petitioner         : Mrs.Dakshayani Reddy
                                                               Sr. Counsel for Mr.K.Manikandan
                                      For Respondents 1&2    : Mr.A.Selvendran, Spl.G.P.
                                      For Respondents 3 & 4 : Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu,
                                                               Standing Counsel
                                      For Respondent No.5      Mr.R.Sivakumar
                                                               Standing Counsel
                                                           *****
                                                          ORDER

(Order of the Court was delivered by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.)

As directed by this Court by its order dated 8.6.2023, the fourth

respondent has filed status report before this Court stating that the fourth

respondent accorded permission to the petitioner to demolish the building in

question vide W.D.C. No.DA/WDCN10/00313/2023 dated 15.5.2023. It is

further stated in the report that the petitioner shall give an undertaking that

after de-sealiing the building in question, the petitioner will demolish the

building within a fixed time frame and till such time, the petitioner should not

utilize the building for any other purpose.

2. The petitioner has filed an undertaking affidavit stating that

the after de-sealing the premises by the respondents, the petitioner would https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.16976 of 2023

commence and complete the entire demolition work within six months from the

date of de-sealing and further, the petitioner undertakes that till such time,

the petitioner would not utilize the building for any other purpose.

3. The learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondent

Corporation submits that the petitioner has sought for long time i.e. six months

for demolition work and stated that reasonable time may be granted by this

Court.

4. Recording the undertaking affidavit filed by the petitioner, the

fourth respondent shall de-seal the premises. Having regard to the status

report filed by the fourth respondent, undertaking affidavit filed by the

petitioner and the submission made by the learned Standing counsel appearing

for the respondent, this Court is inclined to grant three months time to the

petitioner to complete the entire demolition work in the existing building and

till such time, the building in question shall not be used for any other purpose.

5. The Writ petition stands disposed of with the above directions.

No costs.

                                                                        (D.K.K.J. )    (P.D.B.J.)
                                                                                13.6.2023



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

                                                                            W.P.No.16976 of 2023


                                                                             D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J
                                                                                          AND
                                                                                P.DHANABAL, J.

                                                                                           vaan
                     Speaking/Non Speaking order
                     Index: Yes
                     vaan
                     To

1. The Member Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

2. The Additional Secretary (Technical) Housing and Urban Development, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

3. The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Buildings, Chennai 600 003.

4. The Executive Engineer, Town Planning Section – Kodambakkam, Zone 10, Greater Chennai Corporation, No.64, N.S.K. Salai, Chennai – 600 026.

5. The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.

W.P.No.16976 of 2023 and W.M.P.No.650 of 2020

Dated: 13.6.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.16976 of 2023

In the light of judgment cited supra, while considering the bonafide of the

petitioner in not disclosing the correct facts before this Court and without

obtaining planning permission from the authorities, unauthorisedly put up

construction in the said property in question, we are consciously come to the

conclusion that the petitioner is not entitled to the relief as prayed for and

accordingly, writ petition deserves to be dismissed.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter