Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5418 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2023
W.A(MD)No.710 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 05.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
W.A(MD)No.710 of 2023
and
C.M.P(MD)No.6189 of 2023
Selvaraj ... Appellant/4th respondent
-vs-
1.Ariyamuthu ... 1st respondent/Petitioner
2.The District Registrar,
Palayamkottai, Kokkirakulam,
Tirunelveli District.
3.The Sub-Registrar,
Melapalayam, Tirunelveli District.
4.The Tahsildar,
Palayamkottai Taluk,
Tirunelveli District.
5.S.Kumaran
6.S.Mohamed Aatham ... Respondent 2 to 6
PRAYER: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order
dated 17.08.2022 passed in W.P(MD)No.19470 of 2021.
For Appellant : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai for
Mr.K.Chengis Khan
For R-1 : Mr.Vijay Shankar
For R-2 to R-4 : Mr.M.Prakash,
Additional Government Pleader
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page 1 of 4
W.A(MD)No.710 of 2023
JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.]
Being aggrieved by the order of the Writ Court, dated 17.08.2022
made in W.P(MD)No.19470 of 2021, the appellant has filed this writ
appeal.
2. The Writ Court had allowed the writ petition basically on the
ground that the Registrar cannot go into the question of title while
performing the official function of registering the document which is
essentially a ministerial function. There are certain revenue records which
reflect that the petitioner in the writ petition Ariyamuthu has some interest
in the property in question. We do not think that we can go into the
validity or otherwise of the revenue proceedings. The law declared by this
Court is to the effect that the Registrars cannot refuse registration of
documents which are not covered either by Section 22-A or 22-B of the
Registration Act. The Writ Court has found that the document in question
namely the release deed does not fall within the provisions of Section 22-A
or 22-B of the Act. In such circumstances, the Registering Authority has
no right to refuse registration on the ground that there is a cloud over the
title of the executant. If they are allowed to do so, then they will be
usurping the functions of the civil Court and question of title has to be
____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A(MD)No.710 of 2023
gone into only based on evidence and not by the Registrars who are not
judicially trained. It is common knowledge that registration of document
by itself does not invest title on a person in whose favour document is
registered. Hence, we are unable to find fault the Writ Court for having
allowed the writ petition. Therefore, the writ appeal fails and it is
accordingly dismissed. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous
petition is closed.
[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]
05.06.2023
NCC :Yes/No
Index :Yes/No
PM
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A(MD)No.710 of 2023
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
and L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
pm
W.A(MD)No.710 of 2023
05.06.2023
____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!