Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8802 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 July, 2023
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12202 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 21.07.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
Crl.O.P.(MD) No.12202 of 2023
M.Mariappan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The State rep.by
The Sub-Inspector of Police,
All Women Police Station (Rural)
Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli.
Crime No.3 of 2017.
2.M.Malathi ..Respondents
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of
Cr.P.C, to set aside the impugned judgment of conviction and sentence
passed in C.C.No.7 of 2018 by the Judicial Magistrate, Additional
Mahila Court, Tirunelveli dated 12.02.2021.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Saravanan
For Respondents : Mr.S.S.Madhavan
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
for R1
No-appearance for R2
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12202 of 2023
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking for setting aside
the impugned judgment of the conviction and sentence passed in
C.C.No.7 of 2018 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila
Court, Tirunelveli on 12.02.2021.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner that the learned Judicial Magistrate has found the petitioner
guilty of offence under Section 498(A) of IPC, subsequently, the defacto
complainant and the petitioner have settled the matter amicably and
therefore, he sought for recording the compromise.
3. The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for
the first respondent has strongly objected for setting aside the judgment
and also brought to the notice of this Court that aggrieved by the
judgment dated 12.02.2021, the petitioner has preferred a
Crl.A.No.19 of 2021 which was pending initially on the file of the
Principal District and Sessions Court, Tirunelveli and transferred to the
III Additional District and Sessions Court.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12202 of 2023
4. Once the petitioner has preferred an appeal challenging the
conviction and sentence imposed against him in C.C.No.7 of 2018, he
should not have filed the present petition seeking for the same relief. The
Registry should not have permitted this case to be registered.
5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
6. However, it is reported by the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner that the Appellate Court is not entertaining the petition for
recording the compromise. The learned Session Judge is directed to
consider the application and dispose of the same on merits after hearing
all the parties concerned under the law.
Index : Yes/No 21.07.2023 Internet : Yes/No ssb
To
1.The Sub-Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station (Rural) Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12202 of 2023
DR.D.NAGARJUN. J.
ssb
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12202 of 2023
21.07.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!