Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

N.Dhanasekar vs The District Treasury Officer
2023 Latest Caselaw 8766 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8766 Mad
Judgement Date : 21 July, 2023

Madras High Court
N.Dhanasekar vs The District Treasury Officer on 21 July, 2023
                                                                         W.P.Nos.2345 to 2351 of 2015

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 21.07.2023

                                                      CORAM:

                            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

                                             W.P.Nos.2345 to 2351 of 2015
                                             and M.P.No. 2 of 2015 (7 Nos)

                     W.P.No.2345 of 2015 :-

                     N.Dhanasekar                                               ...Petitioner

                                                         -Vs-

                     1. The District Treasury Officer,
                        District Treasury,
                        Vellore,
                        Vellore District.

                     2. The Director of Treasuries
                           and Accounts,
                        Chennai – 15.

                     3. The Government of Tamilnadu,
                        Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
                        Treasuries and Accounts Department,
                        Chennai.

                     4. M.Poonguzhali,
                        Superintendent,
                        District Treasury,
                        Vellore,
                        Vellore District.                                       ... Respondents

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.Nos.2345 to 2351 of 2015

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the second respondent in Rc.Pdl.No.182/13/N1 dated 29.09.2014 and the consequential promotion and posting orders in Rc.No.39684/14/NI-20 dated 30.09.2014 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to give promotion to the petitioner to the post of Accountant with effect form the date when it was due retrospectively and thereby include his name in the appropriate place in the panel of Accountant for promotion to the post of Superintendent with all consequential service and monetary benefits.

In all W.Ps.

                                   For Petitioner     : No appearance

                                   For Respondents
                                    For R1 to R3   : Mr.V.Veluchamy
                                                     Additional Government Pleader
                                         For R4    : Mr.V.Balaji
                                                     For Mr.P.Krishnan


                                               COMMON ORDER

All these writ petitions have been filed challenging the panel

of seniority list dated 29.09.2014 and consequential promotion and

posting order dated 30.09.2014, and also to direct the respondents to give

promotion to the petitioners to the post of Accountant.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.Nos.2345 to 2351 of 2015

2. The petitioners were posted as Junior Assistant in the

District Treasury. They passed necessary departmental tests viz., account

test for subordinate officers part I, account test for subordinate officers

part II and Tamilnadu government office manual test during the month of

May and December in the year 2004 to 2008. However, they were not

included in the promotion panel for the post of Accountant, on the

ground that they have not attended the Bhavanisagar civil service

training and the government has not passed order declaring the

completion of their probation.

3. According to the petitioners, as per G.O.(2D)No.83, Finance

(Treasuries Account-2) Department dated 18.08.2009, their service was

regularized from the date of their joining in the said post. Thereafter,

they also completed the fundamental training meant for Junior Assistants

in the government servant training institute at Bhavanisagar. Though

they made repeated representation to the respondents demanding for their

promotion retrospectively to the post of Accountant, without considering

the same, impugned seniority list was published and consequentially

passed promotion order. The petitioners raised ground that they were

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.Nos.2345 to 2351 of 2015

sent to Bhavanisagar training center belatedly due to administrative

reasons and non declaration of probation in the post of Junior Assistant

on the ground of non completion of Bhavanisagar training cannot be put

against them.

4. On perusal of counter revealed that no junior had been

promoted before the petitioners' promotion, since the petitioners service

have been regularized by the government only on 18.08.2009 vide

G.O.Ms.No.2(D)83 P & AR. Further the petitioners were appointed

based on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, as such

their regularization was not made by the first respondent herein.

Thereafter those who are appointed in the special category was

regularized as special case. Since there was a delay in that processes, it

cannot be taken for consideration. Based on the service of the petitioners,

they were regularized with effect from 18.08.2009 in the post of Junior

Assistant as per the said Government Order.

5. Further the government had relaxed the rule of age criterion

as per Rule 28 of Tamil Nadu Government State Subordinate Service

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.Nos.2345 to 2351 of 2015

Rules and also relaxed the rule of reservations as per Rule 26 of the said

Rules. The general Rule 23(a)(ii) was also relaxed for receiving the

monetary benefits. Further, the service benefits i.e., seniority and

promotion etc., of the petitioners were not found place anywhere in the

said Government Order. Therefore, their eligibility to hold the post of

Accountant commenced only from the year 2010, as such their request to

include their name in the seniority panel from the year 2007 cannot be

considered.

6. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this Court

finds no infirmity or illegality in the order passed by the second

respondent and all the writ petitions are devoid of merits and liable to be

dismissed. Accordingly all the Writ Petitions are dismissed.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall

be no order as to cost.

21.07.2023 Internet: Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order

rts

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.Nos.2345 to 2351 of 2015

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J,

rts To

1. The Principal Secretary, Government of Tamilnadu, Treasuries and Accounts Department, Chennai.

2. The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Chennai – 15.

3. The District Treasury Officer, District Treasury, Vellore, Vellore District.

4. The Superintendent, District Treasury, Vellore, Vellore District.

W.P.Nos.2345 to 2351 of 2015 and M.P.No. 2 of 2015 (7 Nos)

21.07.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter