Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

T.Shanmuga Sundaram vs T.K.Mohan
2023 Latest Caselaw 8580 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8580 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2023

Madras High Court
T.Shanmuga Sundaram vs T.K.Mohan on 19 July, 2023
                                                          1

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                Dated :       19.07.2023

                                                    CORAM

                              THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

                                              C.R.P.No.3283 of 2019
                                                      and
                                             C.M.P.No.21827 of 2019

                     T.Shanmuga Sundaram                         ...Petitioner


                                                      Vs.

                     1.T.K.Mohan
                     2.M.Parimala
                     3.M.Sakthivel
                     4.T.K.Ravichandran
                     5.V.Arul Pravin
                     6.Kasthuri
                     7.G.Ramesh Babu
                     8.G.Suresh Babu
                     9.G.Sabitha Parthiban
                     10.T.Manoharan
                     11.Malathi
                     12.Parvatham
                     13.Pachiammal
                     14.Indian Overseas Bank,
                       Mahalingapuram,
                       Chennai – 600 034.
                     15.Priya.                                   ...Respondents




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                2




                     Prayer:Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution
                     of India to prefer this Memorandum of Grounds of Civil Revision Petition
                     against the Docket order dated 26.11.2018 passed in O.S.No.103 of 2008 of
                     the Additional District Court, Mettur, Salem.
                                  For Petitioner           :     Mr.T.R.Rajaraman
                                                           for M/s.P.Veena Suresh
                                  For Respondents          :
                                  For R14                  :     M/s.V.Rajeswari
                                  For R1                   :     Mr.C.Ramesh
                                  For R4,R8,R9,R10,R14,R15 :           -No Appearance-
                                  For R2,3,5,6,7,11,12,13,16     :     -Not Ready in Notice-

                                                          ORDER

This is a suit for partition. The first defendant filed a written

statement that was adopted by defendant Nos.2,3,4 and 6. Pending the suit,

first defendant passed away and the defendant Nos.2,5 and 6 being parties

to the suit already, the other legal heirs, namely, defendant Nos.16,17 and

18 were impleaded. The application was allowed on 30.03.2010.

2.The Trial Court has noted that the notice in the impleading

application was not served on defendant Nos.16 to 18 prior to allowing the

petition. Similarly, the application filed consequent to the impleading of

parties in I.A.No.450 of 2010 was also allowed without notice to defendant

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Nos.16 to 18.

3.After being impleaded, summons were issued to them on

16.06.2011. Defendant Nos.17 and 18 remained ex-parte. Defendant No.16

entered appearance and filed his written statement. I have to note that a

legal representative cannot have a superior right than the original defendant.

Therefore, the written statement filed by defendant No.16 could not have

exceeded the stand taken by D1. However, the written statement of

defendant No.16 was taken on file but no additional issues were framed.

4.On 18.01.2018 defendant No.2 filed a written statement which was

adopted by defendant Nos.3,4 and 6. However, even at that stage, the

written statement filed by defendant No.16 was not taken into consideration

for framing of issues.

5.In the meanwhile, the plaintiff was examined as P.W.1. Taking note

of the fact that the written statement of defendant No.16 was not taken into

consideration, at the time of framing of issues, the learned Judge has

ordered a de-novo trial.

6.Aggrieved by the same, the present revision has been presented.

Under the Code, a court has to frame issues on the date of first hearing of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

the suit. However, it does not bar a Court from framing additional issues at

any time prior to rendering the judgment.

7.The mistake committed by the court in the present case is not in

issuing the summons to defendant No.16 to 18 in the impleading as well as

consequential amendment petitions but also not taking into consideration

the written statement filed by defendant No.16 at the time of framing of the

issues. This anomaly has been set right by the impugned order.

8. The Learned Trial Judge has exercised his discretion which I do

not want to interfere under Article 227 of the Constitution of India because

at best it is a procedural error, which has been rectified by the court. The

Court will take into consideration, the observations made above, at the time

of disposal of I.A.No.195 of 2018 which has been filed to strike out the

defense of defendant Nos.2,3,4 and 6.

9. With the above observations the CRP is dismissed. No costs.

Connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.


                                                                                         19.07.2023




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis


                     Index             : Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No
                     nst
                     To:

The Additional District Court, Mettur, Salem.

V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN.J.,

nst

C.R.P.No.3283 of 2019 and C.M.P.No.21827 of 2019

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

19.07.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter