Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7754 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 July, 2023
Writ Petition No.19887 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.07.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
Writ Petition No.19887 of 2023
K.Manonmani @ Ambujam
W/o.Late M.Kumaresan ...Petitioner
Vs
1.The District Collector,
O/o.The District Collector,
Pettiyan Chathiram,
Vazhuthavur,
Puducherry - 605 009.
2.The Superintendent of Police,
O/o.The Superintendent of Police,
Orlienpet Police Complex,
Puducherry - 605 005.
3.The Inspector of Police,
Lawspet Police Station,
Lawspet, Puducherry - 605 008.
4.S.Jagannathan
S/o.Sarangapani ... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, praying to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner's
husband's representation dated 21.03.2022 and to direct them to take legal
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Writ Petition No.19887 of 2023
action against the fourth respondent, who acted illegally and to restore the
petitioner's land situated at No.32, 1st Cross Street, Bharathi Nagar,
Karuvadikuppam, Lawspet, Puducherry - 605 008 from the fourth
respondent and pave the way for his livelihood.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Kalaiyarasi
For Respondents : Mr.A.Damodaran
Additional Public Prosecutor [R1 to R3]
*****
ORDER
This petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to
consider the petitioner's husband's representation dated 21.03.2022 and take
legal action against the fourth respondent, who acted illegally and to restore
the petitioner's land situated at No.32, 1st Cross Street, Bharathi Nagar,
Karuvadikuppam, Lawspet, Puducherry - 605 008.
2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Additional Public
Prosecutor appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 3.
3. This petition is not maintainable, in view of the order passed by a
Division Bench of this Court in G.Prabhakaran v. The Superintendent of
Police, Thanjavur reported in (2018) 2 LW Crl 489. The Hon'ble Supreme
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Petition No.19887 of 2023
Court in its latest judgment rendered by a three Judge Bench in
M.Subramaniam v. S. Janaki reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after relying
upon Sakiri Vasu Case, has categorically held that the High Court cannot
issue any direction for registration of FIR in exercise of its jurisdiction
under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. The Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the
informant has to necessarily avail of the alternative remedy provided under
Section 154 (3) of Cr.P.C. and Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C. Liberty is given
to the petitioner to workout his remedy as per the directions issued by the
Division Bench in the order referred supra.
This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of accordingly.
06.07.2023
Index : Yes/No Speaking order:Yes/No Neutral citation:Yes/No gm
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Petition No.19887 of 2023
gm
To
1.The District Collector, O/o.The District Collector, Pettiyan Chathiram, Vazhuthavur, Puducherry - 605 009.
2.The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Orlienpet Police Complex, Puducherry - 605 005.
3.The Inspector of Police, Lawspet Police Station, Lawspet, Puducherry - 605 008.
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
Writ Petition No.19887 of 2023
06.07.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!