Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 71 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 January, 2023
CRP.No.2593 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.01.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
CRP.No.2593 of 2019 and
CMP.No.17080 of 2019
Kuppusamy ... Petitioner
Vs.
Shankar Vadivel ... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision petition is filed under Section 115 of CPC praying to
allow the above revision and set aside the fair and decreetal order dated
04.02.2019 passed in EP.No.76 of 2018 in OS.No.25 of 2004 on the file of the
Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Mathivanan
For Respondent : Mr.S.Sathish Rajan
ORDER
This civil revision petition has been filed to set aside the fair and
decreetal order dated 04.02.2019 passed in EP.No.76 of 2018 in OS.No.25 of
2004 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai, thereby
dismissed the petition filed under Order 21 Rule 11(a) of CPC to attachment by
pro-order of the amount.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP.No.2593 of 2019
2. The petitioner is the defendant and the respondent is the plaintiff.
The respondent filed suit for specific performance in respect of the suit
property on the ground that he entered into agreement for sale with the
petitioner and the total sale consideration was fixed at Rs.40,00,000/-. On the
date of agreement, the respondent paid a sum of Rs.30,00,000/- as an advance
and thereafter, the petitioner failed to come forward to register the sale deed on
receipt of balance sale consideration. The trial court decreed the suit. Aggrieved
by the same, the petitioner preferred appeal suit in AS.No.260 of 2007. The
Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court set aside the judgment and decree and
dismissed the suit with cost. Aggrieved by the same, the respondent preferred
Special Leave Petition before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. The Hon'ble
Supreme Court of India, by order dated 24.08.2017, dismissed the Special
Leave Petition and further directed that the amount deposited by the
respondent before the court shall be refunded to him along with interest, if any.
Thereafter, the petitioner filed execution petition in EP.No.76 of 2018 for
attachment by pro-order of the amount as mentioned in the petition as against
the respondent herein. The court below dismissed the petition for the reason
that when the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India ordered to get back his
Rs.10,00,000/- in favour of the respondent herein and insofar as the cost, no https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP.No.2593 of 2019
order was passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.
3. It is seen that the petitioner is also entitled for cost of a sum of
Rs.3,39,452/- in the appeal suit. At the same time, the respondent is also
entitled for balance sale consideration of Rs.10,00,000/- which was deposited
by him before the trial court with interest, if any. Therefore, both the parties are
at liberty to file appropriate petition in order to execute the order passed by the
Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in AS.No.260 of 2007 and the order
passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in SLP.No.8609 of 2011 dated
24.08.2017.
4. Accordingly, this civil revision petition is disposed of.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
02.01.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking order/non-speaking order lok
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP.No.2593 of 2019
lok To The Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai.
CRP.No.2593 of 2019
02.01.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!