Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 650 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2023
Crl.O.P.No.29481 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.01.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
Crl.O.P.No.29481 of 2022
K.Gowri ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Greater Chennai Commissioner of Police,
Greater Chennai Police Commissioner Office,
EVK Sampath Road, Vepery,
Chennai – 600 007.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Vadapalani Police Station,
Chennai – 600 026. ... Respondents
PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.,
to pass an order of direction, direct the 2nd respondent to register and investigate
the complaint on the file of the petitioner's complaint dated 14.11.2022 in
accordance with law to secure the ends of justice.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Hari
For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh,
Government Advocate (crl.side)
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.29481 of 2022
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 2 nd
respondent to register and investigate the petitioner's complaint dated
14.11.2022 in accordance with law.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the
accused S.Y.Eswaran and his wife Hemalatha Eswaran had prevented the use of
a comman pathway by the petitioner. Despite giving complaint, no action was
taken by the respondents. Therefore this petition.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the
respondents submitted that on the basis of the complaint given by the
petitioner, enquiry was conducted earlier and that was closed on 30.05.2022.
Subsequently, petitioner gave another complaint and on the basis of that
complaint, enquiry in C.S.R.No.18 of 2023 was conducted and it is pending for
further investigation.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Government Advocate (crl.side) for the respondents.
5. The Division Bench of this Court in G.Prabhakaran v. The
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.29481 of 2022
Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur, reported in (2018) 2 LW Crl 489 and the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in its latest judgment rendered by a three Judge Bench
in M.Subramaniam v. S.Janaki, reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after relying
upon Sakiri Vasu's Case, has categorically held that the High Court cannot
issue any direction for registration of FIR. High Court can intervene only in
extraordinary circumstances and rare cases. However, taking note of the fact
that the complaint is being enquired, the Investigation officer is directed to
issue notice to the parties and conduct enquiry as directed by the Hon'ble Apex
Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and
others [2014 (2) SCC (1)]. If any cognizable offence is made out, the
respondent police is bound to register the FIR otherwise they may close the
complaint. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of two weeks from
the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is
disposed of.
11.01.2023 sli Index: Yes/No Internet:Yes/No
G.CHANDRASEKHARAN,J.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.29481 of 2022
sli
To
1.The Greater Chennai Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police Commissioner Office, EVK Sampath Road, Vepery, Chennai – 600 007.
2.The Inspector of Police, Vadapalani Police Station, Chennai – 600 026.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.29481 of 2022
11.01.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!