Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.Gnanamani vs M/S.Shriram Transport Finance ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 1436 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1436 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2023

Madras High Court
M.Gnanamani vs M/S.Shriram Transport Finance ... on 6 February, 2023
                                                                           Arb.Original Petition 90 of 2022


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 06.02.2023

                                                      CORAM:

                         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY


                                    Arb.Original Petition (Com.Div.) No.90 of 2022
                                           and Application No.717 of 2022

                M.Gnanamani                                                    ... Petitioner


                                                         Vs.


                1. M/s.Shriram Transport Finance Co.Ltd.,
                   Represented by its authorized
                   Representative T.Vijayakumar,
                   No.221, CLC Works Rd.New Colony,
                  Chrompet, Chennai - 044.


                2. P.Kumaran                                                  ... Respondent



                PRAYER: The Original Petition has been filed under Section 34(a)(2)(ii)&(iii)
                of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to set aside the purported Ex-parte
                Arbitration Award passed on 16.11.2021 by the Sole Arbitrator vide Arbitration
                case No.792 of 2020 and direct the first respondent to pay the costs of the
                petition.



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                               Arb.Original Petition 90 of 2022




                                            For Petitioner     : Mr.R.Vasudevan

                                            For Respondent     : Mr.Peer Mohamed
                                                             -----


                                                         ORDER

This Original Petition has been filed to set aside the Arbitration

Award passed on 16.11.2021 by the Arbitrator vide Arbitration Case No.792 of

2020.

2. The contention of the petitioner was that the present claim made

before the Arbitrator is barred by limitation. According to the petitioner, in

terms of loan agreement dated 28.09.2010, the petitioner borrowed a sum of

Rs.4,20,000/-. The first due started on 05.11.2010 and the last due date is

05.10.2013. According to him, so far, he has paid eight installments, which

comes to Rs.1,48,243/- and the last payment made by the petitioner was on

27.05.2011. The vehicle was seized on 30.09.2011 and the same was sold for

Rs.2,90,000/-. Therefore, the realized amount comes to Rs.4,38,243/-. In the

said circumstances, the Arbitration Award was passed on 16.11.2021.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.Original Petition 90 of 2022

3. The main contention of the petitioner is that the entire claim is

barred by limitation. Therefore, referring the matter before the Arbitrator and

passing of the Award is not sustainable. Thus, he prays to set aside the Award

passed by the Arbitrator dated 16.11.2021.

4. In support of his contention, he would rely on the judgments of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in Visakhapatnam Port Trust Vs. M/s.Continental

Construction Company [ 2009 (4) SCC 546 ], Mangla Advisory P.Ltd. Vs.

Cybizcal (International) and another [ 2009 (Sup2) ArbiLR 335 ] and

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and Anr. Vs. M/s.Nortel Networks India Pvt.

Ltd. [ SLP(c) No.1531-32/2021 ].

5. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that admittedly,

notice under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, was issued on

31.10.2020 and the last due date is 05.10.2013. He fairly submits that after a

period of seven years from the date of commencement of the limitation period,

the claim was made by the respondent.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.Original Petition 90 of 2022

6. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing

on either side, it is very clear that the present claim was made after a period of

seven years from the date of commencement of the limitation period. It is seen

that the last due date for the repayment of loan is 05.10.2013 and hence, the

claim petition should have been filed on or before 04.10.2016. However, the

present claim petition was filed subsequent to the Section 21 notice dated

31.10.2020. The Section 21 notice was issued after the expiry of three years.

Therefore, the present claim is barred by limitation and the Award passed by

the Arbitrator is not sustainable. Since the Award is passed against time barred

claim, without notice of the same the award came to be passed, hence, the same

is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the Award is set aside and this Original

Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected application is closed. There shall

be no order as to costs.

06.02.2023

asi

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.Original Petition 90 of 2022

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

asi

Arb.Original Petition (Com.Div.) No.90 of 2022 and Application No.717 of 2022

06.02.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter