Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11668 Mad
Judgement Date : 31 August, 2023
W.P.(MD) No.21292 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 31.08.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
and
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
W.P.(MD) No.21292 of 2023
N.Murugan ... Petitioner
-vs-
1.The Secretary
Ministry of Home Affairs
Ministry of Home Affairs North Block
New Delhi-110 001
2.The Home Secretary
Secretariat
St.George Fort, Chennai ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue
a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to issue the highest award of
“BHARATH RATHNA” to Mr.Kalaignar Karunanithi.
For Petitioner : Ms.V.Jeya Rani
For Respondents : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan
Additional Solicitor General of India
assisted by Mr.K.Govindarajan
Deputy Solicitor General of India for R1
Mr.P.Thilakkumar
Government Pleader for R2
____________
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD) No.21292 of 2023
ORDER
[Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE]
The present writ petition is filed seeking a direction against the
respondents to issue the highest award of Bharath Rathna to Mr.Kalaignar
Karunanithi.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
does not belong to any political party nor has any political affiliation.
Considering the work done by Mr.Kalaignar Karunanithi, he deserves to be
awarded the highest civilian award of the country i.e. “Bharath Rathna”.
3. Learned Additional Solicitor General of India submits that the
Apex Court in the case of Balaji Raghavan and others vs. Union of India,
reported in AIR 1996 SC 770, has directed that no award shall be conferred
except on recommendations of National Committee.
4. Mandamus cannot be issued by the Court to direct an Executive
to bestow a particular award upon a person. It would be beyond the realm of
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.21292 of 2023
Article 226 of the Constitution of India and also the Judgment of the Apex
Court in the case of Amitabh Thakur and others vs. Union of India,
reported in 2014 (2) ALJ 260.
5. In the light of that, the request of the petitioner, under Article
226 of the Constitution of India, cannot be considered.
6. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.
[S.V.G., .C.J.] [C.K., J.]
31.08.2023
NCC : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
krk
To:
1.The Secretary,
Ministry of Home Affairs,
Ministry of Home Affairs North Block, New Delhi-110 001.
2.The Home Secretary, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai.
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.21292 of 2023
THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE and C.KUMARAPPAN, J.
krk
W.P.(MD) No.21292 of 2023
31.08.2023
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!