Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11460 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 August, 2023
W.A.No.3603 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.08.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
W.A.No.3603 of 2019
and
C.M.P.No.23146 of 2019
1.The Director of School Education,
DPI Campus, College Road,
Chennai – 600 006.
2.The Chief Educational Officer,
Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur.
3.The Headmaster,
Government Girls Higher School,
Porur, Chennai – 116. ... Appellants
Vs.
K.Sudhakar ... Respondent
Prayer : Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act, praying
to set aside the order dated 26.02.2014 in W.P.No.5641 of 2014.
For Appellants : Mr.Vadivelu Deenadayalan
Additional Government Pleader
For Respondent : No appearance
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.3603 of 2019
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.KUMARESH BABU, J.)
This intra-Court appeal has been preferred being aggrieved against
the order made in W.P.No.5641 of 2014 dated 26.02.2014 passed by the
learned Single Judge directing the respondents/appellant Department to
grant third incentive increment to the petitioner/respondent for obtaining
M.Phil degree.
2. It is submitted that the issue involved in this appeal is no longer
res integra since the Full Bench of this Court had already upheld the
Division Bench judgment made in W.A.1664 of 2016 dated 29.06.2018
which had held that the teacher would be entitled to only two incentive
increments.
3. Admittedly, in this case the respondent herein had already been
granted two incentive increments for possessing higher qualification viz.,
B.Lit. B.Ed. and M.A. Degree. Even in the affidavit filed in support of
the writ petition, he has admittedly sought for the third incentive
increment for possessing M.Phil degree.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.3603 of 2019
4. In view of the admitted fact that the respondent had only sought
for third incentive increment, which he is not entitled, in view of the Full
Bench judgment of this Court dated 29.04.2022 made in W.A.No.3674 of
2022 etc. batch, the order passed by the learned Single Judge would have
to be necessarily set aside.
5. In fine, the Writ Appeal is allowed and the order passed by the
learned Single Judge dated 26.02.2014 is set aside. However, there shall
be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition
is closed.
(R.S.K., J.) (K.B., J.)
29.08.2023
Index : Yes/No
Speaking Order : Yes/No
Neutral Citation : Yes/No
Sgl
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.3603 of 2019
R. SURESH KUMAR, J.
And K.KUMARESH BABU, J.
Sgl
W.A.No.3603 of 2019
29.08.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!