Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sarath Babu vs The Director General
2023 Latest Caselaw 10451 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10451 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2023

Madras High Court
Sarath Babu vs The Director General on 16 August, 2023
                                                                       W.P.No.20613 of 2022

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 16.08.2023

                                                    CORAM :

                            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

                                               W.P.No.20613 of 2022
                                                       and
                                              W.M.P.No.19743 of 2022

                    Sarath Babu                                          ... Petitioner

                                                       Vs.

                    1.The Director General,
                      CRPF, CGO Complex,
                      Lodhi Road,
                      New Delhi – 110 003.

                    2.The Deputy Inspector General Police,
                      Signal Range, CRPF,
                      HC Block Sector-III,
                      Salt Lake, Kolkota,
                      West Bengal – 700 106.

                    3.The Commandant,
                      2nd Signal Battalion,
                      GC Campus, CRPF,
                      Keshovgiri,
                      Hyderabad – 500 005.

                    4.The Commandant,
                      1st Battalion, CRPF,
                      Jharoda Kalan,
                      New Delhi – 110 072.


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis


                    Page 1 of 14
                                                                                   W.P.No.20613 of 2022



                    5.The Commandant,
                      77 Bn, CRPF,
                      Special Jail Complex,
                      Poonamallee,
                      Chennai – 600 056.                                            ... Respondents

                    Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                    for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records
                    pertaining to order dated 8.07.2022 issued by the 1st Respondent in
                    proceedings No. 1/2022- COMM- DTE- CDA-14- COM-DG transferring
                    the petitioner from 2 Signal Bn Platoon at 77 Battalion, CRPF,
                    Poonamallee, to 1st Signal Battalion at New Delhi and quash the same in
                    so far as petitioner concerned and directing the 5th respondent to allow
                    him to continue in 77 Battalion, CRPF, Poonamallee till completion of his
                    normal tenure of 3 years as he reported on transfer from hard area
                    Sukhma, Chattisgarh.

                                  For Petitioner      : Mrs.Rita Chandrasekar
                                                        for M/s.R.Meenakshi

                                  For Respondents     : Mr.S.Diwakar
                                                        Senior Panel Counsel


                                                        ORDER

This writ petition has been filed challenging the order of the 1st

respondent, dated 08.07.2022, transferring the petitioner from 2 Signal Bn

Platoon at 77 Battalion, CRPF, Poonamallee, to 1st Signal Battalion at

New Delhi and to direct the 5th respondent to allow the petitioner to https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.20613 of 2022

continue in 77 Battalion, CRPF, Poonamallee, till completion of his

normal tenure of 3 years, as he reported on transfer from hard area

Sukhma, Chattisgarh.

2.The petitioner states that he was appointed as Constable

(General Duty) on 03.03.2003 in Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF).

Consequent to his success in the departmental test for the post of Head

Constable/Crypto during the year 2007, the petitioner went for training at

CTC-T-IT, Ranchi, Jharkhand. Thereafter, he was posted to 4th Signal Bn

and further, posted to 2 Signal Battalion. Though he was posted in Signal

Battalion, he served in duty Battalions deployed at various places in the

country as follows :

                      Sl.           From          To         Unit/Office               Place
                      No.
                       1.         24.03.2003   22.05.2004 143 Bn           Basic Training at Pallipuram,
                                                                           Kerala.
                       2.         22.05.2004   15.01.2007 143 Bn           Sunderbani (J&K)/Kashmir
                       3.         15.01.2007   26.07.2007 CTC-T-IT         Ranchi Jharkhand
                                                             th
                       4.         26.07.2007   22.07.2014 4 Signal         Nimach(MP)/New
                                                                           Delhi/Gujarat/Bawana       (New
                                                                           Delhi)/Jharkhand
                       5.         22.07.2014   22.12.2014 2 Signal Bn      Hyderabad
                       6.         22.12.2014   01.06.2018 2 Signal Bn      Peringom (Kerala)
                       7.         01.06.2018   24.08.2021 2 Signal Bn      Sukma (Chattishgarh)
                       8.         24.08.2021    Till date   2 Signal Bn    77 Bn, CRPF at Poonamallee,
                                                                           Tamil Nadu
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis



                                                                                   W.P.No.20613 of 2022

The petitioner reported in 77 Battalion, CRPF, Poonamallee, during the

month of August, 2021, on transfer from Sukhma (Chattishgarh). On

reporting, he applied for outliving permission to keep his family outside

the campus for his father's treatment and the same was granted to the

petitioner vide Office Order No.18/2021-QM(G)-QM1-STR-077 Bn,

dated 13.11.2021, by the 5th respondent. The petitioner brought his family

from home town, i.e., from Kerala, and settled near his Battalion

Headquarters at Poonamallee, Chennai, and he admitted his son in IV

Standard in Sudharsan Vidhyadarshan School, Avadi, during the month of

December, 2021. The petitioner has completed only 10 months tenure at

Poonamallee, Tamil Nadu, however, according to the norms, the tenure of

posting is 3 years, but he has been transferred to 1st Signal Battalion,

CRPF, New Delhi. In this regard, a representation has also been given by

the petitioner, however, the same has not been considered. Hence, the writ

petition has been filed.

3.It is the contention of the petitioner that the respondents have

failed to note the Standing Order No.07/2015. As per the above Standing

Order, normal tenure in field station is 4 years and for hard field area/SOZ,

static and peace stations is 3 years, whereas, the petitioner has completed https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.20613 of 2022

only 10 months in Poonamallee. As per the above Standing Order, the

petitioner should not be transferred out prematurely and should be allowed

to complete the tenure, except in exceptional cases with consent from

Directorate. Hence, the transfer order has been challenged in this writ

petition.

4.In the counter affidavit filed by the respondents, it is stated

that the petitioner was posted to Signal Platoon of Recruit Training Centre

(RTC), CRPF, Peringome, Kerala, w.e.f. 22.12.2014 to 31.05.2018, i.e., 3

years, 5 months and 11 days. After completion of his tenure in RTC,

CRPF, Peringome, he was posted to 217 Bn, Signal Platoon, Sukma,

Chattisgarh, in Summer Chain Posting-2018, vide 3rd respondent's Office

Signal No.T.IX-1/2018(SCP)-2 Sig, dated 11.04.2018. After completion

of 3 years tenure in 217 Bn, as per 3 rd choice submitted by the petitioner,

he was further posted to 77 Bn, CRPF, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, Signal

Platoon in Summer Chain Posting-2021. Thereafter, the petitioner was

posted in 5th respondent Office w.e.f. 24.08.2021 to 17.08.2022. After

completion of 7 years, i.e., 2 postings, 4 years in hard/field units and 3

years in static/soft units/Coy signal Platoon of normal tenure in 3rd

respondent Office, the petitioner has been transferred to 1st Signal Bn, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.20613 of 2022

New Delhi in Summer Chain Transfer-2022, issued by the IG (Comn &

IT), Directorate, New Delhi, vide PPMS Office Order No.01/2022-Comn-

Dte-CDA14-Com-DG, dated 08.07.2022.

5.It is the contention of the respondents that, as per Standing

Order No.11/2002 relating to transfer of Non-Gazetted Signal Personnel

(upto the rank of Inspectors), the Signal Personnel should invariably be

posted to a field unit in operational area. They will not be kept at static

sub-units or Group Centres as far as possible. So, all personnel will be

rotated during Summer Chain Transfers, so that they get equitable

opportunity to serve in soft/static locations. The tenure of an individual in

a field unit will be 4 years. Thereafter, the individual shall be posted to a

static unit for 3 years. The tenure in a Signal Battalion will be 7 years.

Since the petitioner has completed 7 years tenure in the 3rd respondent

Office, in which he was posted in static location (i.e, Hyderabad,

Peringome (Kerala) and Chennai) for more than 4 years and posted in hard

area (i.e., Sukma, Chattisgarh) for 3 years, the petitioner has been

transferred to the 4th respondent Office in Summer Chain Transfer-2022 by

the IG (Comn & IT), Directorate, New Delhi, vide PPMS Office Order

No.01/2022-Comn-Dte-CDA14-Com-DG, dated 08.07.2022. Hence, the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.20613 of 2022

respondents oppose the writ petition.

6.The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner

is that, as per Standing Order No.07/2015, normal tenure in field station is

4 years and for hard field area/SOZ, static and peace stations, the tenure is

3 years, whereas, the petitioner has completed only 10 months in

Poonamallee. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the

petitioner should not be transferred out prematurely and should be allowed

to complete the tenure except in exceptional cases with consent from

Directorate. Further, whenever, any transfer is ordered prematurely, i.e.,

prior to the completion of normal tenure, reasons justifying the premature

transfer shall be mentioned in the transfer order. According to the learned

counsel for the petitioner, the impugned transfer is against the Standing

Order. Therefore, the learned counsel submitted that the impugned order

is liable to be set aside. In support of his submissions, the learned counsel

placed reliance on the judgment of this Court in Durai Murugan v. The

Director General, CRPF, New Delhi and others [W.P.No.15430 of 2019

dated 11.12.2019].

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.20613 of 2022

7.Per contra, learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the

respondents, would submit that the petitioner is working in Signal

Battalion and therefore, only Standing Order No.11/2002 alone is

applicable to him. The Signal Personnel should invariably be posted to a

field unit in operational area. They will not be kept at static sub-units or

Group Centres as far as possible. So, all personnel will be rotated during

Summer Chain Transfers, so that they get equitable opportunity to serve in

soft/static locations. The tenure of an individual in a field unit will be 4

years. Thereafter, the individual shall be posted to a static unit for 3 years.

The tenure in a Signal Battalion will be 7 years. Since the petitioner has

completed 7 years tenure in the 3rd respondent Office, in which he was

posted in static location and hard areas, the petitioner has been transferred

to the 4th respondent Office in Summer Chain Transfer-2022. Hence, it is

the contention of the learned Senior Panel Counsel that the transfer has

been effected only as per the Standing Order governing the petitioner.

8.Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the entire

materials available on record.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.20613 of 2022

9.In the light of the submissions made by the learned counsel on

either side, the issue that arises for consideration is whether the impugned

transfer order passed by the 1st respondent is against the Standing Orders.

10.The writ petition has been filed mainly on the ground that

there is violation of Standing Order No.07/2015, stating that the petitioner

has been transferred prematurely. Standing Order No.07/2015 relates to

the transfer of Non-Gazetted (Executive/Technical/Tradesmen) Force

Personnel including Mahila Personnel. Clause 2 of the Standing Order

No.07/2015 makes it clear that it is governing the changeover of non-

technical personnel of Signal Range to executive Battalions and vice-

versa. Whereas, the Standing Order No.11/2002 deals with transfer of

Non-Gazetted Signal Personnel (upto the rank of Inspectors). Clause 7(a)

of the Standing Order No.11/2002 makes it clear that Signal Battalions

will forward names of personnel who complete 7 years of service every

year to Communication Directorate for considering their transfer within

the Signal Range. The above Standing Order No.11/2002 makes it clear

that the signal personnel's tenure is 7 years. After completion of 7 years,

they will be transferred. Clause (3) of Standing Order No.11/2002 makes https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.20613 of 2022

it clear that newly recruited, remustered Signal personnel should

invariably be posted to a field unit in operational area. They will not be

kept at static sub-units or Group Centres as far as possible. All personnel

will be so rotated during Summer Chain Transfers, so that they get

equitable opportunity to serve in soft/static locations. The tenure of an

individual in a field unit will be 4 years. Thereafter, he shall be posted to

a static unit for 3 years. Clause (3) also makes it clear that the tenure in a

Signal Battalion will be 7 years.

11.It is seen that the petitioner has been posted for more than 4

years in static areas, i.e., Hyderabad, Peringom (Kerala) and Chennai. The

petitioner has worked in Hyderabad from 22.07.2014 to 22.12.2014 in 2

Signal Bn and thereafter, he was posted to 2 Signal Bn in Peringom

(Kerala) from 22.12.2014 to 01.06.2018. Thereafter, the petitioner has

been posted to 2 Signal Bn in 77 Bn, CRPF at Poonamallee, Chennai on

24.08.2021 till the transfer order has been passed. The above postings

make it clear that the petitioner has been posted in static/soft areas for

more than four years. As far as hard area is concerned, the petitioner was

posted in hard area, i.e., Sukma (Chattisgarh) from 01.06.2018 to

24.08.2021, i.e., for 3 years. Therefore, only after completing 7 years, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.20613 of 2022

now, the petitioner has been transferred to 1st Signal Battalion at New

Delhi.

12.Therefore, this Court is of the view that, when the Standing

Order No.11/2002 is very clear stating that the tenure of a personnel in

Signal Battalion is 7 years and the impugned transfer has been made on

the basis of the said Standing Order No.11/2002 governing the personnel

of disciplined force, now, the same cannot be challenged merely on the

basis of some inconvenience. The petitioner contests this writ petition on

the basis of Standing Order No.07/2015, whereas, Standing Order

No.11/2022 is only applicable to the Signal Personnel, including the

petitioner.

13.The judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the

petitioner in W.P.No.15430 of 2019 (supra) cannot be applied to the facts

of the present case, since the said writ petition is relating to Standing

Order No.07/2014 dated 24.11.2014.

14.Therefore, when the Disciplined Force have their own set of

Rules and even as per their Rules and Standing Orders governing and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.20613 of 2022

applicable to the petitioner, i.e., Standing Order No.11/2002, the tenure in

Signal Battalion is 7 years and the petitioner has also completed more than

7 years in a Signal Battalion and only thereafter, now, transfer has been

effected to another Battalion, this Court is of the view that such transfer

cannot be interfered with.

15.Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.



                                                                                      16.08.2023
                    mkn

                    Internet : Yes
                    Index    : Yes / No
                    Neutral citation : Yes / No
                    Speaking order / Nonspeaking order

                    To

                    1.The Director General,
                      CRPF, CGO Complex,
                      Lodhi Road,
                      New Delhi – 110 003.

                    2.The Deputy Inspector General of Police,
                      Signal Range, CRPF,
                      HC Block Sector-III,
                      Salt Lake, Kolkota,
                      West Bengal – 700 106.


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis



                                              W.P.No.20613 of 2022



                    3.The Commandant,
                      2nd Signal Battalion,
                      GC Campus, CRPF,
                      Keshovgiri,
                      Hyderabad – 500 005.

                    4.The Commandant,
                      1st Battalion, CRPF,
                      Jharoda Kalan,
                      New Delhi – 110 072.

                    5.The Commandant,
                      77 Bn, CRPF,
                      Special Jail Complex,
                      Poonamallee,
                      Chennai – 600 056.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis



                                           W.P.No.20613 of 2022



                                    N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.
                                                   mkn




                                      W.P.No.20613 of 2022




                                                 16.08.2023


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis



 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter