Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

B.Sukumar vs The Member Secretary
2023 Latest Caselaw 10053 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10053 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 August, 2023

Madras High Court
B.Sukumar vs The Member Secretary on 9 August, 2023
                                                                          WP No.28447 of 2022

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                              DATED:    09.08.2023

                                                      CORAM

                            THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA , CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                       AND
                                    THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

                                              WP No.28447 of 2022

                     B.Sukumar                                             ... Petitioner
                                                       -vs-

                     1. The Member Secretary,
                        CMDA, Thalamuthu Natarajan Building,
                        No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore,
                        Chennai 600 008.

                     2. The Commissioner,
                        Greater Chennai Corporation,
                        Rippon Building, Chennai 600 003.

                     3. The Zonal Office,
                        Zone-06, Ward-78, Greater Chennai
                         Corporation, No:158, Strahans Road,
                        Pattalam, Chennai 600 012.

                     4. The TANGEDCO,
                        No:144, Anna Salai,
                        9th Floor, Chennai 600 002.

                     5. Rajesh Agarwal
                     6. Ramesh Agarwal                                     ... Respondents

                     Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
                     issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to
                     implement the order dated 23.06.2022 to demolish the unauthorised
                     building No:43/18, Nammazhwar Street, Choolai, Chennai 600 007 of

                     Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   WP No.28447 of 2022

                     the 5th and 6th respondents.

                                  For the Petitioner      :       Mr.S.Natarajan

                                  For the Respondents     :     No appearance for R-1
                                                          :     Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu for RR 2 and 3
                                                          :     Mr.N.Muralikumar,
                                                                Senior Counsel for RR 5 and 6
                                                              *****


                                                              ORDER

(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

We have heard Mr.S.Natarajan, learned counsel for the

petitioner, Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu, learned counsel for respondents 2 and 3

and Mr.N.Muralikumar, learned senior counsel for respondents 5 and

2. The learned senior counsel for respondents 5 and 6 submits

that the present petition is not a public interest litigation but a

personal interest litigation. Only the building of respondents 5 and 6

is targeted. The petition is filed only for the purpose of black-mailing.

Such a petition cannot be entertained. Reliance is placed on the

judgment of a Division Bench of Bombay High Court in Sarthi Seva

Sangh vs. Mumbai Municipal Corporation, reported in 2022 SCC

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.28447 of 2022

OnLine Bom 3139.

3. The Corporation has filed a status report stating about the

deviations in the building of respondents 5 and 6. Further action was

taken under Section 57 read with 85 of the Tamil Nadu Town and

Country Planning Act, 1971, against 5th and 6th respondents on

24.07.2023.

4. In the present writ petition, we are not going to decide about

the nature of the construction, whether there is any deviation or not.

The Corporation has taken an action. The respondents 5 and 6 have

remedy available to them.

As the Corporation has already taken action, no orders are

necessary in the writ petition. The writ petition as such is disposed

of. There will be no order as to costs.

                                                            (S.V.G., CJ.)             (P.D.A., J.)
                                                                            09.08.2023
                     Index                   : Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation        : Yes/No

                     sra


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.28447 of 2022

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.

(sra) To

1. The Member Secretary, CMDA, Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.

2. The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, Chennai 600 003.

3. The Zonal Office, Zone-06, Ward-78, Greater Chennai Corporation, No:158, Strahans Road, Pattalam, Chennai 600 012.

4. The TANGEDCO, No:144, Anna Salai, 9th Floor, Chennai 600 002.

WP No.28447 of 2022

09.08.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter