Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4858 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 April, 2023
Crl.O.P(MD)No.4881 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 26.04.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
Crl.O.P(MD)No.4881 of 2021
and
Crl.M.P(MD)No.2788 of 2021
R.Arul Rani Fernando .. Petitioner/Accused
Vs.
R.Kanni Aarthi .. Respondent/Complainant
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned
summon dated 04.02.2021 in S.T.C.No.23 of 2021 issued by the learned
Judicial Magistrate No.I(Fast Track Court at Magistrial Level), Madurai
and to quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sankarapandian
For Respondent : No appearance
Page No.1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P(MD)No.4881 of 2021
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with
liberty to raise all the points before the trial Court and he seeks
indulgence of this Court to dispense with the personal appearance before
the trial Court. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. Recording the said endorsement, this Criminal Original Petition
is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous
petition is closed. Further, this Court directs the learned Judicial
Magistrate No.I(Fast Track Court at Magistrial Level), Madurai, to
dispose the case in S.T.C.No.23 of 2021 within a period of six months
from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the personal
appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court is ordered to be
dispensed with on the following conditions:
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.4881 of 2021
(i) The petitioner is directed to give an undertaking in the form of
affidavit that she will be duly represented by a counsel on all hearing
dates.
(ii) The petitioner shall not dispute the identity of the witnesses.
(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the Court in the event her
presence is insisted by the trial judge for the purpose of identification.
(iv) If the petitioner adopt any dilatorial tactics, it is open to the
Trial Court to insist for her appearance and deal with the petitioner in
accordance with the judgment of Supreme Court of India, in State of
Uttar Pradesh Vs. Shambunath Singh, reported in 2001 (4) SCC 667.
26.04.2023
NCC : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Index : Yes/No PJL
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P(MD)No.4881 of 2021
K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN,J.
PJL
To Judicial Magistrate No.I, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Madurai.
Crl.OP(MD)No.4881 of 2021
26.04.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!