Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4560 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 April, 2023
W.P.No.6184 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.04.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P.No.6184 of 2020
Selvarajan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector,
Ariyalur,
Ariyalur District.
2.The Tahsildar,
Jayankondan Taluk,
Jayankondan. ... Respondents
Prayer:
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to
issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to return
Rs.30,000/-.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Franklin
For Respondents : Mr.S.Bala Murugan
Government Advocate
ORDER
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of
Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to return Rs.30,000/-.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.6184 of 2020
2.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the Ex-
Panchayat President of Nayaganaipiriyal Panchayat and that there
was a charge against the petitioner that he misappropriated a sum of
Rs.67,729/- and vide proceedings dated 01.10.1998, the second
respondent directed the Village Administrative Officer to collect a
sum of Rs.67,729/- and an order of attachment was also passed by
the second respondent on 02.08.2001. Challenging the order dated
02.08.2001, the petitioner filed W.P.No.26175 of 2001 before this
Court and this Court during the course of adjudication, directed the
petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.30,000/- and thereafter disposed of
the said writ petition on 08.09.2010. For the said charge, a case in
Crime No.35 of 1998 was also registered by the T.Palur Police Station
and thereafter vide judgment dated 22.09.2014, the learned Judicial
Magistrate, Jayankondan acquitted the petitioner, however, the
deposited amount of Rs.30,000/- has not yet been returned to the
petitioner. Hence, this writ petition.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted
that the petitioner made representation dated 17.03.2015 to the
respondents seeking refund of Rs.30,000/- through his counsel.
Hence, without going into the merits of the case, it would suffice, if
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.6184 of 2020
this Court issues direction to the respondents to consider the
petitioner's representation dated 17.03.2015 made through his
counsel and to pass appropriate orders within a reasonable time
frame.
4.Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any
opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents to consider
the petitioner's representation dated 17.03.2015 made through his
counsel, on merits and in accordance with law and to pass
appropriate orders, within a period of six weeks from the date of
receipt of a copy of this order.
5.This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.
20.04.2023 pri Speaking Order/ Non Speaking Order Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/ No
To
1.The District Collector, Ariyalur, Ariyalur District.
2.The Tahsildar,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.6184 of 2020
Jayankondan Taluk, Jayankondan.
M.DHANDAPANI,J.
pri
W.P.No.6184 of 2020
20.04.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.6184 of 2020
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!