Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4012 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 April, 2023
W.A(MD)Nos.442, 452 & 453 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 10.04.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
W.A(MD)Nos.442, 452 & 453 of 2022
and
C.M.P.(MD)No.4250 of 2022
in
W.A.(MD)No.442 of 2022
M/s.Hari & Co.,
Rep. by its Managing Partner,
M.Annamalaiswamy ... Appellant in all W.As.
-Vs-
The Assistant Commissioner (ST)-2,
Tuticorin-2-(C) Assessment Circle,
Tuticorin. ... Respondent in W.A.(MD)No.442 of 2023
The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC),
Tuticorin-III Assessment Circle,
Tuticorin. ... Respondent
in W.A.(MD)Nos.452 & 453 of 2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
W.A(MD)Nos.442, 452 & 453 of 2022
COMMON PRAYER: Writ Appeals filed under Clause 15 of the Letters
Patent, praying this Court to set aside the common order dated 01.03.2022
made in W.P(MD)Nos.3796, 3800 and 3787 of 2022.
For Appellant : Mr.R.D.Ganesan
For Respondent : Mr.P.T.Thiraviyam,
Government Advocate
(in all W.As.)
COMMON JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.]
Challenge in these Writ Appeals is to the common order of the Writ
Court dated 01.03.2022 made in W.P(MD)Nos.3796, 3800 and 3787 of 2022.
2.Though the Writ Petitions were filed, seeking a Writ of Certiorari to
call for the records pertaining to the Demand Notices of the respondents dated
30.09.2019, 30.12.2020 and 30.12.2020 respectively, demanding entry tax from
the petitioner, the issue relating to the payment of entry tax is no longer
res-integra. It is covered by a judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in
Sri Balakrishna Transport Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Tambaram I
Assessment Circle, Chennai, reported in (2010) 28 VST 356 (Mad). The said
judgment was also followed by the Division Bench of this Court to which one
of us (R.SURBAMANIAN,J.) is a party in W.A.(MD)No.332 of 2007.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2/4
W.A(MD)Nos.442, 452 & 453 of 2022
3.In view of such settled position of law, where this Court held that
the demand notice is not valid, since there is no specific provision for
assessment of a person, who has not filed return, these Writ Appeals stand
allowed, the order of the writ court is set aside and the impugned Demand
Notices stand quashed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous
petition is closed.
[R.S.M.,J.] & [L.V.G.,J.]
10.04.2023
NCC : Yes / No
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
MYR
To
1.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)-2,
Tuticorin-2-(C) Assessment Circle,
Tuticorin.
2.The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC),
Tuticorin-III Assessment Circle,
Tuticorin.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3/4
W.A(MD)Nos.442, 452 & 453 of 2022
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
AND L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
MYR
COMMON JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A(MD)Nos.442, 452 & 453 of 2022
10.04.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!