Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

A.Vivekanandan vs The Director General Of Police
2022 Latest Caselaw 16982 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 16982 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 October, 2022

Madras High Court
A.Vivekanandan vs The Director General Of Police on 28 October, 2022
                                                                               W.P. No.11434 of 2013


                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED: 28.10.2022

                                                            CORAM

                                         THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

                                                   W.P. No.11434 of 2013
                                                   and M.P. No.2 of 2013

                      A.Vivekanandan                                         .. Petitioner

                                                             Vs

                      1.The Director General of Police,
                        Post Box No.609,
                        Dr.Radha Krishna Road,
                        Chennai-4.

                      2.The Superintendent of Police,
                        Office of the Superintendent of Police,
                        Bangalore Road,
                        Krishnagiri Town and District.                       .. Respondents


                      Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
                      praying to issue a writ of Certiorari to call for the entire records in
                      connection with the impugned order of the second respondent
                      DO.240/2013 RC.No.C1/25003/12 dated 02.04.2013 and quash the
                      same Proceedings of the second respondent dated 02.04.2013.


                                  For Petitioner        :     Mr.M.Sriram

                                  For Respondents       :     Mr.G.Ameedins,
                                                              Government Advocate




                      1/4



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                        W.P. No.11434 of 2013


                                                            ORDER

Challenging the impugned order in DO.240/2013

RC.No.C1/25003/12 dated 02.04.2013 passed by the second

respondent, this writ petition has been filed.

2.The petitioner herein while serving as a Driver/Grade-II

Police Constable in the Armed Reserve was involved in a motor

accident, resulting in injury to a Civilian. When the injured person had

made a claim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in M.C.O.P.

No.611 of 2007, a judgment and decree passed on 16.08.2011, fixing

the compensation of Rs.1,79,830/-. On 26.09.2012, the second

respondent herein had passed an order directing the petitioner to pay

the compensation amount to the victim. Thereafter, the second

respondent had passed another order on 02.04.2013 directing

recovery of the compensation amount in 36 instalments from the

petitioner. Challenging the order of recovery, the present writ petition

has been filed.

3.The writ petition requires to be allowed on the simple ground

of violation of the principles of natural justice. When the Motor

Accident Claims Tribunal had passed the judgment awarding

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.11434 of 2013

compensation, the direction to pay the compensation amount was

fixed on the second respondent herein. However, when the second

respondent had passed the order on 26.09.2012 directing the

petitioner herein to pay the amount, he was not put on prior notice.

The second respondent had also not challenged the judgment of the

Tribunal, whereby the compensation was awarded. This apart, when

the second respondent had passed the other order on 02.04.2013, the

same was based on the orders issued by the Director General of Police

dated 15.12.2012 which proceedings was also without any prior notice

to the petitioner herein. The order of recovery is in gross violation of

the principles of natural justice and hence cannot be sustained.

Accordingly, the impugned order dated 02.04.2013 passed by the

second respondent is quashed. The writ petition stands allowed

accordingly. Consequently, connected M.P. stands closed. No costs.



                                                                                  28.10.2022
                      Index       : Yes
                      vga








https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.11434 of 2013

M.S.RAMESH,J.

vga

To

1.The Director General of Police, Post Box No.609, Dr.Radha Krishna Road, Chennai-4.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Bangalore Road, Krishnagiri Town and District.

W.P. No.11434 of 2013 and M.P. No.2 of 2013

28.10.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter