Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

I.Narayana Devendrer vs The State Information ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 16791 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 16791 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 October, 2022

Madras High Court
I.Narayana Devendrer vs The State Information ... on 26 October, 2022
                                                                     W.P(MD)No.7422 of 2015



                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                              DATED: 26.10.2022

                                                    CORAM

                                  THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

                                            W.P(MD)No.7422 of 2015

                     I.Narayana Devendrer                                 ... Petitioner

                                                       Vs.

                     1.The State Information Commissioner,
                       Tamil Nadu State Information Commission,
                       No.2, Thiagarayan Salai,
                       Eldams Road Junction,
                       Teynampet,
                       Chennai-18.

                     2.The Assistant Registrar,
                       Tamil Nadu Information Commission,
                       No.2, Thiagarayan Salai,
                       Eldams Road Junction,
                       Teynampet,
                       Chennai-18.

                     3.The Principal Secretary to the Government,
                       Health and Family Welfare Department,
                       Secretariat,
                       Fort St. George,
                       Chennai.




                     1/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                W.P(MD)No.7422 of 2015

                     4.The Public Information Officer,
                       Health and Family Welfare Department,
                       Secretariat,
                       Fort St. George,
                       Chennai.                                                    ... Respondents

                     PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus,
                     calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the
                     first respondent in Case No.35519/E/2014, dated 17.02.2015, confirming
                     the rejection of first appeal by the Appellate Officer, dated 30.06.2014
                     and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to
                     furnish the information sought for by the petitioner vide his application,
                     dated 05.04.2014.

                                        For Petitioner   : M/s.B.Jameel Arasu

                                        For R-1 & R-2    : M/s.K.K.Senthil
                                        For R-3 & R-4    : M/s.A.Baskaran
                                                           Additional Government Pleader

                                                         ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed challenging an order

passed by the first respondent herein, under which, the request of the

petitioner for furnishing information has been rejected, on the ground

that it is voluminous in nature and the petitioner is noway connected with

the said information.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.7422 of 2015

2. The petitioner has sought for information relating to the name,

address, education qualification, post graduate qualification, date of

joining of Doctors in the Government Hospital between 2009 and

01.01.2014. Though it may not be necessary to furnish reasons for

seeking the said information, it could be seen that the petitioner is noway

connected with the said information.

3. The information that has been sought for is voluminous in

nature and it does not fall within the definition of "information" as

contemplated under Section 2(f) of the Right to Information Act, 2005.

4. The object of the Right to Information Act is to secure, access to

information under the control of the public authorities only in order to

promote transparency and accountability in working of every public

authority. Unless the authorities under the RTI Act find that the

information sought for would amount to promoting transparency or

accountability in working of every public authority, all sundry

information that has been sought for by the citizens need not be

furnished to the information seeker.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.7422 of 2015

5. In view of the above said facts, the authorities under the Right

to Information Act have rejected the request of the writ petitioner for the

above said information. The learned Counsel appearing for the first

respondent has brought to the notice of the judgment of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court reported in 2011 (8) SCC page 497 (Central Board of

Secondary Education and another Vs. Aditya Bandopadhyay and

others) in paragraph No.67 has held as follows:

"67. Indiscriminate and impractical demands or directions under the RTI Act for disclosure of all and sundry information (unrelated to transparency and accountability in the functioning of public authorities and eradication of corruption) would be counterproductive as it will adversely affect the efficiency of the administration and result in the executive getting bogged down with the non-productive work of collecting and furnishing information. The Act should not be allowed to be misused or abused, to become a tool to obstruct the national development and integration, or to destroy the peace, tranquility and harmony among its citizens. Nor should it be converted into a tool of oppression or intimidation of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.7422 of 2015

honest officials striving to do their duty. The nation does not want a scenario where 75% of the staff of public authorities spends 75% of their time in collecting and furnishing information to applicants instead of discharging their regular duties. The threat of penalties under the RTI Act and the pressure of the authorities under the RTI Act should not lead to employees of a public authorities prioritising "information furnishing", at the cost of their normal and regular duties."

6. In view of the above said judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme

Court, the Act should not be allowed to be misused or abused to become

a tool to obstruct the national development and integration of destroying

peace, tranquility and harmony among the citizens. The indiscriminate

and impractical demands which would be counterproductive as it will

adversely affect the efficiency of the administration should not be

permitted under the RTI Act.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.7422 of 2015

7. In view of the factual situation and the judgment of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court, I do not find any illegality or infirmity in the order

passed by the authorities under the RTI Act. The writ petition stands

dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.



                                                                                      26.10.2022
                     Index              :     Yes / No
                     Internet           :     Yes / No
                     btr

                     To

1.The State Information Commissioner, Tamil Nadu State Information Commission, No.2, Thiagarayan Salai, Eldams Road Junction, Teynampet, Chennai-18.

2.The Assistant Registrar, Tamil Nadu Information Commission, No.2, Thiagarayan Salai, Eldams Road Junction, Teynampet, Chennai-18.

3.The Principal Secretary to the Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.7422 of 2015

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

btr

4.The Public Information Officer, Health and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai.

Order made in W.P(MD)No.7422 of 2015

26.10.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter