Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.K.Nagar Housing Society vs The Chairman
2022 Latest Caselaw 16162 Mad

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 16162 Mad
Judgement Date : 12 October, 2022

Madras High Court
K.K.Nagar Housing Society vs The Chairman on 12 October, 2022
                                                                     WP.Nos.10211 of 1984 & 13423 of 1986

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED : 12.10.2022

                                                      CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

                                        WP.Nos.10211 of 1984 & 13423 of 1986

                  W.P.No.10211 of 1984
                  K.K.Nagar Housing Society, Salem
                  by its President Dr.V.Muthusami                                        .. Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                  1.The Chairman
                  Tamil Nadu Housing Board
                  Madras

                  2.The Special Tahsildar (LA)
                  Neighbourhood Scheme
                  Salem

                  3.State of Tamil Nadu
                  Represeted by the Commissioner
                   and Secretary to Government
                  Housing and Urban Development
                   Department, Madras – 9                                            .. Respondents

W.P.No.13423 of 1986

1.C.Kuppuraj

2.C.Rangaraj

3.C.Vasantha alias Vanaja

4.C.Revathi

5.C.Thilakam .. Petitioners Versus

1. The Government of Tamil Nadu Represeted by the Commissioner and Secretary to Government Housing and Urban Development https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

WP.Nos.10211 of 1984 & 13423 of 1986

Department, Fort St.George, Madras – 9

2.The Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer Salem Housing Unit, Aiyatherumaligai Road Salem – 8

3.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquistion) Jawan's Building, Fort Main Road Salem .. Respondents

Prayer in W.P.No.10211 of 1984: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the acquisition proceedings as declared under Sec.6 of the Land Acquisition Act by the 3rd respondent in G.O.Ms.No.449, Housing and Urban Development Department dated 12.06.1984 and quash the same insofar as it relates to the petitioner.

Prayer in W.P.No.13423 of 1986: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the acquisition proceedings as declared under Sec.6 of the Land Acquisition Act by the 3rd respondent in G.O.Ms.No.1126, Housing and Urban Development Department dated 26.07.1983 and published in Tamil Nadu Govt. Gazzette Extraordinary dated 29.07.1983 insofar as it relates to the petitioner and quash the same

W.P.No.10211 of 1984 For Petitioner : Mr.I.Mahaboob Sheriff (No appearance) For Respondents : Mr.D.Murugan for R1 for Tamil Nadu Housing Board Mr.T.K.Saravanan for R2 & R3 Government Advocate

W.P.No.13423 of 1986 For Petitioners : Mr.I.Mahaboob Sheriff (No appearance) For Respondents : Mr.D.Murugan for R2 for Tamil Nadu Housing Board Mr.T.K.Saravanan for R1 & R3 Government Advocate https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

WP.Nos.10211 of 1984 & 13423 of 1986

COMMON ORDER

These writ petitions have filed challenging the acquisition proceedings as

declared under Sec.6 of the Land Acquisition Act by the 3rd respondent in

G.O.Ms.No.449 and 1126, Housing and Urban Development Department

dated 12.06.1984 and 29.07.1983 respectively and quash the same insofar as it

relates to the petitioners.

2. Since the issues involved in both the writ petitions are one and the

same these writ petitions are heard together and decided by way of this

common order.

W.P.No. 10211 of 1984.

3. The petitioner's association filed this writ petition challenging the land

acquisition proceedings initiated by the respondent officials on the ground of

vagueness. Initially, this writ petition was allowed by this Court by order dated

30.10.1991. As against the order, the State preferred appeal in W.A.No.3133 of

2001 and the Division Bench of this Court allowed the writ appeal by

judgment dated 08.09.2006, on the ground that the learned Single Judge view

has been reversed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Tamil Nadu

vs. L.Krishnan (AIR 1996 SC.497) and remitted the matter back to the learned https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

WP.Nos.10211 of 1984 & 13423 of 1986

Judge dealing with the subject for final hearing. Though, the writ petition is

pending from the year 1984, it was listed for hearing on 10.10.2022 and no

one appeared on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was today, under the

caption 'for dismissal'. Today, also there is no representation for the petitioner.

4. In view of the above, this writ petition stands dismissed for non

prosecution. No costs.

W.P.No. 14323 of 1986.

5. The petitioners filed this writ petition challenging the land acquisition

proceedings initiated by the respondent officials on the ground of vagueness.

Initially, this writ petition was allowed by this Court by order dated

30.10.1991. As against the order, the State preferred appeal in W.A.No.3133 of

2001 and the Division Bench of this Court allowed the writ appeal by

judgment dated 08.09.2006, on the ground that the learned Single Judge view

has been reversed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Tamil Nadu

vs. L.Krishnan (AIR 1996 SC.497) and remitted the matter back to the learned

Judge dealing with the subject for final hearing. Though, the writ petition is

pending from the year 1984, it was listed for hearing on 10.10.2022 and no

one appeared on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was today, under the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

WP.Nos.10211 of 1984 & 13423 of 1986

caption 'for dismissal'. Today, also there is no representation for the petitioner.

6. However, the learned Government Advocate submitted that

subsequently, the petitioners herein filed another writ petition before this Court

in W.P.No.14761 of 2016 seeking for declaring the impugned notification as

lapsed in terms of Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and

Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

and the same subsequently withdrawn the petitioners herein on 31.08.2021.

7. In view of the above, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.

12.10.2022

dhk Index:Yes/No

1.The Chairman Tamil Nadu Housing Board Madras

2.The Special Tahsildar (LA) Neighbourhood Scheme Salem

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

WP.Nos.10211 of 1984 & 13423 of 1986

dhk

3.State of Tamil Nadu Represeted by the Commissioner and Secretary to Government Housing and Urban Development Department, Madras – 9

4.The Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer Salem Housing Unit, Aiyatherumaligai Road Salem – 8

5.The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquistion) Jawan's Building, Fort Main Road Salem

WP.Nos.10211 of 1984 & 13423 of 1986

12.10.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter